Search results

Given the number of times people got to get back to the doctor because they didn't get treated the first time, which is a common memory, I guess the error rate is not insignificant -- though the risk of fatal error rate is certainly low. This document from the French HAS (health ministry...

Well, the laws protecting people against themselves are rarely popular among every single person (if they were, maybe a law wouldn't be necessary). That's why some think that a representative governement is better than a direct democracy, because it's easier to inform a small circle of lawmakers...

I think the seatbelt analogy is quite good, though. Why do we mandate people to use seatbelt? Because they are demonstrated to diminish the number of death and improves the quality of life of survivors, yet people didn't wear it based on communication alone, so indeed the law was established to...

This is true. Or at least we're agreeing on this. No, I wasn't. I was saying initially that consensus would be impossible to find because there are lot of nuanced situation between countries (and within countries in some case, as you correctly added). Limitations on what a technological tool...

Sure. Nobody is proposing, as far as I know, to trust a general purpose LLM with a diagnosis. However, if I wanted to know about a few illness that cause flu-like symptoms, not because I want a diagnosis but because I want to read about some exotic diseases out of boredom or to create the...

Sure, and that's great (and interesting!) when it shows that different countries do find sometimes widely different solutions to apply to common problems, or that things aren't a problem at all. With regard to the topic at hand, I think general purpose LLMs accessible through a website should...

This is incorrect. You mentionned the Sackler case as an illustration of how you said liability works (and how actual use, even if unintended, will lead to the AI company being liable despite disclaimers). Except that it's an illustration on how liability work in the US and possibly other common...

With models that focus on modifying details used after a model doing a first draft, it can be the same amount of detail changing, up to minutiae. And it can be both a boon (when you don't have something very specific in mind and are positively surprised by the other person's creative input) or...

That was certainly true two years ago, when prompts were limited to 75 words. Nowadays, you can get quite detailed prompts (1000 words) all taken into account and the most recent solutions (like SeedEdit), including open source one you can run on your own computer (Flux Kontext), allow for...

That's a... strong stance on the question. I think it might depend on the level of precision of the needed artwork. Working for a patron (who gives you money to let you create without any input on what you do) certainly doesn't limit or influence creation. We attribute David to Michelangelo...

Writing 23,000$ on a watermelon and calling that debt art should be mentionned in the thread about AI art. While she failed to sell the artwork, 2 milions views might have helped her.

That's somewhat reassuring!

That's it. The least professional use case I have for AI is to generate pictures for my campaign journal (and portraits for character sheets). If it costed 10 € per image, I wouldn't spend any electricity on it. When it cost 1 € per image, I generate a few, when it cost 1 cent per image, I'll...

Given that someone tried to bring an avatar to speak for him, according to the article, I am thinking the entry bar to become a lawyer might be raised a little.

Not sure, is it? I guess you could sell a photocopy you made of a tree, while Van Gogh failed to sell most of his paintings. Famously, the Portrait du Docteur Rey was used to close a chicken coop for a decade because it had absolutely no value. Yet it contained the same amount of human...

The process of imagining the result is a key part of the artistic process, I'd say. Execution (how to turn the idea into the result) is secondary. If a device was able to print the score of a music or print an image directly from the mind, I don't think I'd value it less than the same result...

Market value, certainly. Enjoyment value, I don't think it's necessarily so. I've a replica of a Mondrian painting in my entrance hall, and I don't think I'd be enjoying it more if it was the original. Actually, if it was an original, I probably would have to keep it in a safe at a bank...

Most people are trained with knives (if only by their mum telling them not to play with them), the same they are trained with many tools we take for granted (few people answer the people speaking in the TV). AI will probably needs some adjustment, hopefully less than the printing press. Initial...

Nice correction. I am sorry for using the word random inappropriately when I meant to say that the time one's case is heard is both unpredictable and outside of the personal control of the tried party and, mostly, the court itself. I thought it was intelligible. I'll make sure to be more precise...

Sure, that where the "other factors". Comparisons that are not all things being equal can't lead to meaningful results.