Search results

good for you. I didn't say it was impossible. but the thing is, the more sessions are in the campaign, the more chance that the campaign will brake. It can be DM burnout, RL problems, just getting 5-6 people with free time at the same time and place, what not. if you reduce number of sessions...

I'm clear, but I would keep one Reaction as special move or ability, but put AoO on once per Turn counter so melee monsters(and characters) can be more deadly in melee.

I would stick with one Reaction per Round, but I would decouple AoO from using reaction and have it "Once per Turn". To give melee characters ability to be more sticky vs multiple opponents. adding things that provoke AoO: drinking potion/applying weapon oil/posion casting spell that is not...

it's the same as Fey touched and Shadow touched. just with different flavor. OK, the attack disadvantage might be too much extra, but expertise in thief tools and adv vs traps is no niche that is too weak for a feat, but it's a way worse shield, you need to do it before attack and it still...

this, if you hope to get to level 20, you better start your campaign at level 11+.

you get fixed 2nd level spell that you can cast once per Long rest and you get one 1st level of choice from selected schools. It's clear enough. No one will ever spend a feat to get expertise in thieves tools so adding something extra justifies the existence of this feat.

I like all suggestions. but maybe to have a touch of the 3.5e Greenbound summoning: you get only Summon animal spirit spell. not the 1st level spell. and when you cast Summon animal spirit, you treat the spell level of the spell as 2 levels higher. basically getting one extra attack for the...

Saw this and immediately got PTSD from that beyond broken feat in 3.5e.

if you want more "stable" roll outcome, replace d20 with 3d6, same average, will force rolls close to average amount. or what I prefer is replacing d20 with d12+4. also same average, extremes are trimmed out, keeps once dice mechanic so advantage/disadvantage works similar, and attacks get more...

ability to run a single big bad without dozens of adds, so it does not get "action economy-ed" to death by 5 PCs.

TWF should have always been a part of Attack action or even better, whenever you can make a melee attack you can make two attacks, once with each light weapon. adding mastery in 2024 was just a hotfix with a mastery tax as they would put their own foot in their mouth if they just added that TWF...

maybe add that the target(after dealing critical damage) must be under 50% HP(bloodied) or even under 25%(near death) to have decapitation activated. this will still give nice feeling to players and speed up combat a little or little more, depending on HP limit, but prevent super easy combats...

outside 1 level of fighter on full casters for heavy armor/con saves, one level of ranger on fighter to use HM on extra attack+action surge I do not see any other point in multiclassing as is, it's just delaying your primary class high level features. also, to me multiclassing is in essence...

"buying" titles is usually a free bonus for your quests. if someone gives me a choice to buy a +1 sword or some (useless)title, I'll take the sword. you can always count on a better sword.

magic items.

2nd that the DS9 is best Startrek series. And season 1 does not have that many terrible episodes, OK, Move along home needs to be deleted from the timeline, but are any more that are that horrible?

with 14 Cha, I would run from any DC/attack spell. there is a lot of candidates to have that are buffs to you and ignore low casting stat.

it scales horribly, maybe if it's +2 missiles or even +3 missiles per spell level.

1: attack with your main hand weapon in attack action triggers off hand with Nick mastery triggers off hand Bonus action attack via Feat 2. 2nd attack with attack action(if 5th level ranger or higher. now you have 3 options. 1. sacrifice 2nd main hand attack(if 5th level) 2. sacrifice off hand...