Search results

Depends on the length of the adventuring.

Mage slayer comes way too late In my opinion.

Actually against high level foes it nearly does not matter as they have such a high bonus, odds are youblose initiative aghinst them anyway,except when you put every resource you have into it. And then the qiestion is if putting your resources elsewhere is equally efficient.

Ah. Thank you.

Maybe. And int based. Still a lot better than just a subclass of something. Link please?

It is to the wizard as the druid is to the cleric. Closely related but enough on their own to warrant a new class. I like that it builds upon the subclass mechanics of fighter and rogue and also introduces wild talent feats.

I rather use the fail by 5 or more for spcecial failures and succeed with a cost mechanic to allow narrative control for the players. Rolling a 1 on an attack is just described as a little slapstick action.

If you redistribute extra attacks anyway, give 3rd attack at level 10, not 9 or 11. Extra attack at level 5,10,15 and 20. Spell levels 1,3,5,7,10,12,15,17,20

I agree. I would just describe it as the arrow passing through. At high range, tmit might not be obvious if it does so beacause of an illusary nature or some other effect. An illusiory creature could as well be a ghost. So I might allow a free study check.

Yes. Probably better just say: haunters's mark is always active.

I am still unsure, but I somehow want to play a longbow archer with great weapon mastery. I am not sure however how to realize it best. I am thinking about an eldritch knight. We need high dex, medium str. Medium con, high int. So stats are: Str 13 Con 12 Dex 15+2 Int 14+1 Wis 10 Cha 8...

Because class identity.

How do you use warthful smite with a ranged weapon?

Yeah. That is some kind of a workaround. Probably you can cast it on yourself just fine. Maybe both spells, hunter's mark and hex should work that way as default: Target: self When you cast it or on a later round, you can use a bonus action to mark or hex a target. On a later turn you can use a...

I like those fixes. One last fix I'd like is removing verbal component from the spell. And maybe allow it to also be cast during an attack action for free at level 13.

Maybe. But I do use line of sight for both effects.

The janitor?

As I said, sloppy choice of words by me.

I don't like quite a few things in the sage advice... and I actually think they are wrong (great weapon fighting). In this case I think you can technically read it either way... turn to dust if you reach zero can mean it does not turn the orc into dust because they don't reach zero. The half...

I misinterpreted your first reply: "Sorry, but nope." as if you don´t want to publish it there. Again, my bad.