Search results

So, it seems a spell-less paladin is now due.

I would let a player drop his amour/shield proficiencies to gain Unarmoured Defence (AC = 10 + Dex + Cha modifier).

In a Planescape/Spelljammer campaign, sure.

Yes. …but, all Planesape/Spelljammer campaigns contain FR, DL, GH, yet not all FR, DL, GH campaigns contain Planesape/Spelljammer.

Oh, and no one enjoys how Boba died, made the story, which is what we're doing here, less fun.

If I found a DM gave the BBEG an extra 73 HP to make it last a little longer, I would not mind.

Nice, and funnily enough I just converted the Favoured Soul last week (as a whole base class). I, like some others, think it was inspired to use the Sorcerer as the base, and now I have 2 versions for my payers to use. The big seller of 5th Ed for me is: conversion, I have been having a...

Hahahahaha…wow, I hope you have been drinking…

There seems to be a nasty thing going on, with the whole not letting player's in on the whole deal. As, usual, it seems to have boiled own to nasty bullcrap; we just know "balance", but, not the superbly named "balance", as has, has "emerged".

As I said on other thread, there is this vulgarly entitled sense of new player to do with D&D…I hate them…they are silly…why: 1st Ed: years went by without your precious Complete Gnome Cobbler's Handbook coming out, and the game was fine, it is nothing more than daft, childish people who think...

So, you're what?

Yes, give the journey to Gwaihir, give the journey to Elminster…yeah, doesn't quite work out like that…

Save ends. The pre-4th Ed thing of getting stunned for 3d4 rounds was seriously not cool.

Yep, otherwise Rakshasas could walk through many buildings/walls in Sigil with impunity.

Yeah, seems more trouble (fiddly) than it's worth with this edition; I got on fine without one in 3rd Ed, so I am sure I will be fine. 4th Ed, on the other hand, can get hectic, with all the condition tracking.

I can sort of see what you mean, same for the Warlock, feels a bit like they were contrived/forced in. Both are relatively new, in the legacy department.

From what I have heard, it sounds like D&D is being treated more as a peripheral product, which could be the best thing to happen to it for a long while. …yeah, yeah, we're working on MtG and Transformers stuff, you guys do what you like with that little D&D thing…

If some were are around for 1st Ed, they would have been severely disappointed. Even the core 3 books were staggered over a few years, whole years where no books came out at all, but somehow it was not only supported, but at the height of its popularity. There is some odd new breed of...

Yes.

My first house-rule was upping the trident's damage to 1d8, Versatile (1d10). As for the OP, I can see what you mean, but used sparingly; still include a magic greatsword or what-have you, but once in a while maybe the party comes across a more obscure, less-used weapon, but it has seriously...