Search results

T Just to add to this. They have already converted the entire Rise of the Runelords and Curse of the Crimson Throne AP's to Savage Pathfinder for you. If you're looking at other AP's you could easily use these two as templates on how to convert the others.

DC20 looks interesting. It borrows a lot of mechanics from other RPG's and combines them in a way that feels different from other games. I'm not sure that's considered "redefining" but it's not bad from what I've seen. There's stuff in there inspired by 5e and PF2e, and I see some throwbacks to...

I've found that it handles the lengthy Paizo (and Dungeon magazine) adventure paths extremely well. Better than PF1e or 3.5e did. The power curve is not as significant as you level up, and Savage Worlds handles high level fights just as good as low level ones.

Savage Pathfinder was easy to back for me. DC20 looks interesting, but I'm hesitant to go past the PDF level for a couple reasons. First, the art is kinda hit and miss for me. The cover is too cartoony and I've never been a fan of all the purple DC uses. Second is the layout. Again with the...

Already backed! This will likely get showcased when Egg posts the crowdfunding projects that are ending the last week of June.

Looks good to me!

It's the brush stroke style that makes it fuzzy or blurry looking. The mage's position is very unclear, it almost looks like she's beside and in front of the beholder at the same time. Plus how is she casting spells while within the monster's anti-magic cone? Minsc's sight line isn't looking at...

The style is too blurry and washed out. Same complaint for the other two covers. Also the characters are always in some weird pose facing in an odd direction instead of facing their enemy. IMO the Pathfinder covers blow these out of the water both in their art style and composition.

Blech! Two thumbs down.

I'm preferential to the 3.5e dragon designs myself, those really hit it out of the park.

I can question the reviewer's score based on the information provided by the reviewer though, which is what I did.

No, they were called Member berries alright! https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Memberberries

Yup, same with Dark Sun.

Hasbro is doing the same thing Disney/Marvel is doing. Step 1. Dig up part of their IP catalog for "member berries". Step 2. Update it for modern audiences. Step 3. Hire a few social media bots to troll fans who voice criticisms of the product. Step 4. Pay for a few good critic reviews. Step...

Yup. Gotta monetize that IP.

Not snubbed. Dark Sun and Birthright remain safe.

Yeah... I'm not sure WotC has any writers left with enough talent to hit that bar. Aren't most combats in 4e and 5e just HP slug fests? I too would have expected a lower grade than an A- as well. Perhaps a C+ or at most a B- would be more reasonable?

I've had a much different experience DM'ing 3.5e. Maybe it's because I know the rules by heart and most of the quibbles with it can be addressed by plugging in Pathfinder changes. I dunno, but I like how it scales a lot better than 5e does, and I love the plethora of options for it.

I didn't even notice they had that on the cover. That knocks this one down to my least favorite cover.

Yeah the 3.5e books are my faves as well. For the cover AND the edition.