Search results

After a first search I couldn't find it in Unearthed Arcana... Could you be more specific?:)

Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (3.0 - Usable with 3.5) page 55: hmmmm... come to think of it now, some lines could easily reignite the antimagic field endless debate :p

Yes I do understand what initiator level is. As kitcik says, I'm asking whether HD counts as a class (a non martial adept class in our case) for the purpose of increasing initiator level... or not. Well argued... still, those are feat rules. Exactly those are the only lines I know of... HD...

In the Tome of Battle for Dummies handbook from BG (old link in case the new one is only allowed to members), the author mentions the following: Now, in the Bot9S it only mentions that a martial adept counts half his class levels when adding to his initiator level. As far as I know, there is...

The spell explicitly states that: This spell creates the visual illusion of an object, creature, or force, as visualized by you. Thats ANYTHING you can think of. The limit's of one's imagination is the only limit of the spell... and its volume. Here's a part from one of my posts from an old...

Limited Wish is for sissies... Wish, now... that is a man's spell. .....you guys are weak.

Will they differ (in content) with the black/leather bound/special edition ones?

Rules Compendium (2007), page 5 "Introduction" Rules Compendium, page 11 "Antimagic/Spells" For Greenfield & dakuth

Yes. This is entirely possible. By D-Dooring as your second standard action, you can fully profit from Schism. If I recall correctly Sekhmet mentioned that earlier. Well, if you consider the fact that Schism gives a second standard action as something that trumps general rules, then every...

One might get insulted... but hey... I assume we are not here to hurt each other's feelings.... so ;) I don't think you 'll find anyone to argue against that. Still, whenever a rules-question is asked in ENW, it is first and formostly asked on a RAW basis. So if you are not arguing based on...

And where does it say that D-Door prevents the mind from continuing to act in given turn? ...Because all I read is "After using this spell, you can’t take any other actions until your next turn." This has nothing to do with working minds etc... its just the simple fact the the spell/power does...

Hello everyone! I was discussing about the possible combination of the two powers (Schism + Dimension Door, Psionic) with a friend, and it seems we have a disagreement. So here is my question: Can a Psionic character take another action in the same round and AFTER he has manifested Dimension...

Blindsight (special abilty) Blindsense (special abilty) Tremorsence (special abilty) Scent (special abilty) Blindsight spell Tremorsense spell Scent spell Listening Lorecall Arcane Sight/Detect Magic Faerie Fire Glitterdust Corpse Candle Daylight Antimagic Field Celestial Brilliance...

You can achieve the same thing with Magic Aura as is. You simply alter one (or more!!!) item's aura and you make it blindingly powerful (caster level 9th as well). From Detect Magic: Magical areas, multiple types of magic, or strong local magical emanations may distort or conceal weaker auras...

? I quoted you so as to point out that it's different from misdirection in respect to the number of different kinds of auras each spells fools. Misdirections alters ALL kinds of auras (as I quoted in green from the SRD in my previous post) while the variant affects ONLY magical auras, meaning...

Not Really. Misdirection affects all auras: By means of this spell, you misdirect the information from divination spells that reveal auras (detect evil, detect magic, discern lies, and the like). +Detect Undead+whatever else I'm missing... whilst the proposed MA variant affects only magical...

No. That would make the spell overly powerful. An "evil" aura (or any alignment aura) is not a magical aura. The spell would only alter the auras perceived by Detect Magic, Arcane Sight and all (Sp)s and (Su)s based on those. ...In exactly the same way the core Magic Aura spell works. Perhaps...

So... if we created a "Magic Aura" variant that allowed the caster to affect a single aura on himself instead of a single aura on an item (no other changes)... would that affect the spell's level? So we get this: and make this: EDIT: This variant would not replace the existing spell. It...

I agree with RUMBLETiGER... you 've got a lot of work ahead of you. But if I was to give you a single advice, it would be this: Improvisation is your best friend. No matter how prepared you are, there is never a way to plan ahead for everything your PCs might decide to do. This is why...

...Hmm funny. I would probably ask the opposite. Aren't all those low-level "detect alignment" abilities broken?