Search results

So you believe people inferred that the reprints would be a Remastered edition that had not been announced yet? Did you even think that or did you not notice the announcement at that time? I think you may be confused about who has the extreme position.

My post about whether Paizo should release new books was actually on the Paizo forums, not EN World. The title of the post is "Pathfinder Next Edition Thoughts." Several posters responded they did not want new books. I was critical of Wizards when they attempted to deauthorize the OGL, but my...

It's called a lie by omission. People get called on it all the time. I discussed Paizo releasing new books to help new players about a month ago and was laughed at because no one believed Paizo would print new books 4 years after release and no one wanted them. When this statement was made on...

"Of course, Paizo plans to continue publishing Pathfinder and Starfinder, even as we move away from the Open Gaming License. Since months’ worth of products are still at the printer, you’ll see the familiar OGL 1.0(a) in the back of our products for a while yet. While the Open RPG Creative...

Would love to know if you believe this Remaster will thoroughly decouple PF and D&D legally considering it's being done with rather impressive speed or if it's more likely they will still miss some OGL items not in CC. As a very experienced publisher, you would probably know more of what that...

Well, now I'm confused because Paizo has specifically stated they need to remove certain magic items and monsters, and that necessitated the new printing. You're right though. The SRD is under CC. I was mistaken in my earlier post. I'm not a Pathfinder player, but I'm not sure a light...

The latest spin from Paizo that the short-lived lifespan of their Core Rulebook is all Wizards' fault is especially stretching the truth. Many of their players have expressed all the issues that have needed errata and the company themselves have admitted a huge 640 page rulebook wasn't a good...

I watched a stream the other day with Erik Mona as the guest discussing the announcement of PF 2E Remastered. Wizards' involvement with the Pinkertons and the failure of 4e were both brought up during the first 30 minutes of a two-and-a-half hour stream. I understand that Wizards should not...

I simply believe that Paizo did not release the information about their update of their rules in a timely manner. The community should hold them accountable for this. That's it. Am I asking too much? I'm not releasing any new rulebooks so I don't think it applies to me.

I'm sorry. They have been totally transparent. They have assured all their new players that this was not a bait-and-switch. They have done those things, right? When you decide you are going to update rulebooks the ethical decision is to let possible buyers know that day. Not a week later...

The fact you had to write that much to explain the meaning of that statement confirms why it is misleading. Do you think I may not be the only one who got a bit lost?

They should rage when any underhanded techniques used by any company.

Erik Mona stated on a Roll for Combat stream on April 26 that Paizo announced Pathfinder Remastered work began a few months ago. The accepted time frame for the phrase "a few months" is 3-5 months. With that wording they may have actually been working on it during December or November of last...

Once again let me reiterate-I have no problem with them printing new books. I have a problem with their misleading statement on January 12 where Paizo inferred they would not need to update the rules. I have a problem when, during a record sales spkie, Paizo did not give new buyers the common...

People really need to look at Paizo a little more critically for doing this.

Just don't split hairs to prove a point here. The statement made on Jan 12 stating that PF 2e doesn't have Wizards' expressions is misleading and should not have been made. As a matter of fact, this is really when Paizo should have announced they will be remastering this edition because...

I hope you're right. They will really impress the RPG community if they create a remaster of the entire game in 9 months including printing time. I hope they thoroughly tested the dozens of changes they are making that will affect thousands of player option combinations. I don't want to see...

Are they going to be able to rename or redesign all of them this time? I mean thay haven't in 14 years so am I being unreasonable to anticipate they may not be able to do it in a project they claim only started a few months ago? It's a catch 22. Either they still use the ones they think are...

Paizo stated multiple times during the OGL scandal they could reprint the Core Rulebook with no attestation or under the ORC. It was written without Wizards' copyrighted expressions of any game mechanics according to their blog post on January 12. The book names are lame because I don't...

Once again let me make this clear. I don't have a problem with Paizo publishing new books to avoid entangelment with Wizards. I have a problem with Paizo's misleading January 12 announcement where they stated in writing on their blog, "our designers and developers wrote the new edition...