Search results

Actually it's very helpful. It has always been my intent for the PDF to be the working GM's primary reference: find exactly the monster(s) you need for the session, print him out on a single page. EDIT: For the record, we have 582 monster statblocks, and that number does not include the...

Maybe he's sad because he's spent hours and hours doing monkey work, like trying to track down stealth errors like comma and semicolon usage or wondering why the bat has low-light vision in his senses entry and the dire bat doesn't. That's the kind of sadness that even cracking open a shinbone...

Just about all the content will be available in PDF, regardless. So it won't necessarily be "gone" gone. But I need to know what folks want to see in hard copy.

User Preference... NOTE: There is a PDF attached to this post for review. Well, I've been quietly chugging away on the layout of the book, and I'm at a bit of a crossroads regarding formatting and usability. 1) Font size. First of all, we won't be repeating the mistake we made in the main...

EDIT: I don't care what you're playing, and I don't mind saying it myself, but Combat Reactions really need to be a core part of any 3.5 ruleset.

Definitely looks to be some yoinkable stuff there (based on the brief review in the thread). For many of them, I'd probably lean more towards making them standard Combat Reactions (rather than requiring a Feat).

You really get it.

Third party publishers have no ability to add anything to the SRD. Everything published as Open Content by a 3rd party publisher was (and still is) Open Content.

No time to answer you from a mechanics standpoint-- but I can comfortably predict, "Less Fun" on both counts.

The TOTAL AC column is a good column for comparisons against a PC who focuses on keeping his AC high. Note, for example, that it includes a heavy shield; including a magic shield bonus as levels advance. For a character who doesn't use a shield, you're going to eventually fall behind by 7 AC (+2...

Pick any 3pp book you own and flip to the back page, OGL, Section 15. I doubt you really looked, or would have known it if you saw it, or would have cared if you did.

Thank you!

Post it.

Goblins --> Boglins EDIT: Thanks for the XP fellas. I think El Mahdi's "Mind Boglin" comment absolutely deserves its own MM entry.

I was with Bihor on this one, but your explanation is quite persuasive.

It's in the 3e SRD (link in original). A 20HD zombie in PF is CR7.

Yeah, I reckon you should get him about half the time. For me, turning vs. damaging was an important thematic distinction, and that's why I came down where I did (despite having some good leads on the damage route). I spent a long time, actually, wondering whether the inevitable HD-driven...

Drop the hammer!

Well there you go. It's been banned for so long in my game I had no idea of its provenance.

1) It's not included because it isn't (to my knowledge) in the SRD. If it's not Open Content, we really can't address it. 2) Wild Shape isn't quite as open to abuse as it used to be, so I'd perhaps allow the feat, strictly from a balance perspective. However, it still interferes with my sense...