Search results

Right. Both are designed to put story first. You can always choose to ignore story ala massive dungeon crawls that make little sense from pretty much any fictional standpoint.

Right. Both are designed to put story first. You can always choose to ignore story ala massive dungeon crawls that make little sense from pretty much any fictional standpoint.

That PC is not inherently a ritual caster unless it spends a feat to obtain it.

That PC is not inherently a ritual caster unless it spends a feat to obtain it.

Right. I think one of the big feature/bugs of Vancian casting is this idea that a Wizard goes from 'barely can cast anything' of some fantasy literature 'powerhouse Wizard' to being a 'Vancian demigod' — except, unlike any of that literature, they get to keep options from each of those set of...

Right. I think one of the big feature/bugs of Vancian casting is this idea that a Wizard goes from 'barely can cast anything' of some fantasy literature 'powerhouse Wizard' to being a 'Vancian demigod' — except, unlike any of that literature, they get to keep options from each of those set of...

I think one of the decisions made by R&D for 5e is that high level play is exceedingly rare and therefore it is more important to be aspirational than balanced. Wizards dreaming of 9th level spells is great for the game even if they never get to cast them. Or especially if they don't get to cast...

I think one of the decisions made by R&D for 5e is that high level play is exceedingly rare and therefore it is more important to be aspirational than balanced. Wizards dreaming of 9th level spells is great for the game even if they never get to cast them. Or especially if they don't get to cast...

What about Ghostwalker — targets miss her most of the time, she shifts in response. The concealment could be defined as 'drunken swaying' and mostly always on concealment is great for Rogues.

Are you referring to ADCP4-1 City of Destinies? http://www.livingforgottenrealms.com/adventures/ADCP0401LFR.zip

Excessive repetition that never got errata'd out.

I think RAW is about 90% there. Key is no use of the word of 'each'. There's just the argument otherwise. There's a host of powers that do very, very odd things if you read it otherwise. Including powers that apparently only end if any ally, specific, hits a target 3 times, but as long as no...

If a group has 'realism' limits for martial PCs, what are the definitions of those limits for martial PCs? That usually leads to option number 3 eventually, often involving the DM doing the blowing up. It is relatively easy to build an optimized 4e Fighter who takes powers that all have...

If a group has 'realism' limits for martial PCs, what are the definitions of those limits for martial PCs? That usually leads to option number 3 eventually, often involving the DM doing the blowing up. It is relatively easy to build an optimized 4e Fighter who takes powers that all have...

Not particularly hard. They're useful, but not particularly necessary. Simply gaining an extra E7 or lower, U10 or lower, and a D19 or lower from your class is reasonably balanced for a paragon path. For Epic Destiny, just give +2 to two stats at 21st and a free class utility at 26th of 22nd or...

Not particularly hard. They're useful, but not particularly necessary. Simply gaining an extra E7 or lower, U10 or lower, and a D19 or lower from your class is reasonably balanced for a paragon path. For Epic Destiny, just give +2 to two stats at 21st and a free class utility at 26th of 22nd or...

What part of "If you don't choose" something makes it sound compelled? You have the page number, feel free to look it up...

What part of "If you don't choose" something makes it sound compelled? You have the page number, feel free to look it up...

How is this? Page 172 of PHB: "If you don’t choose an epic destiny at 21st level, you can choose one at any level thereafter."

How is this? Page 172 of PHB: "If you don’t choose an epic destiny at 21st level, you can choose one at any level thereafter."