Search results

  1. I

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    I’ll agree to disagree if you agree to stop framing your argument as undeniably true.
  2. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    In the end, it's a game, so it won't matter if that word is not included. I say that jokingly. It matters to you and others who would like to include attractiveness in the definition of Charisma. Perhaps you can take into account that it matters to other people, too, who would like to exclude...
  3. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    I think you risk closing off the options for me to say, "I am beautiful and I have a low charisma."
  4. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    Sorry, yes, confusing question. If beauty is a part of Charisma, can we have physically attractive low-Charisma PCs? Can players describe their characters as attractive, or are they constrained by that low CHA ability score?
  5. I

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    I do deny that! First, I deny that declining to buy a product is retaliation. Second, I deny that declining to buy a product is harmful. That is not taking anything away from anyone. I could spend every cent of my disposable income on WotC games and it would provide no benefit to 3rd party...
  6. I

    TSR The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR

    The five-star “review” has been deleted.
  7. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    What about the other way around? Would you expect DMs to accept that a low-strength PC could be described as having athletic training and bodily power but lacking in the third component (the ability to exert raw physical force)? Would it be a problem to have two characters, each with athletic...
  8. I

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    Fact: Declining to buy products is not harmful.
  9. I

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    Consider instead believing them when they say they were harmed. Just a thought.
  10. I

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    Why is it so important to convince people who feel harmed that they were not actually harmed? And why try to convince people who feel harmed that they actually benefited?
  11. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    No. If it's easier to imagine, it's because the players are ignoring the answer to that first question above and chosing a superficial perspective that undermines nuance and verisimilitude in world-building. That's a valid choice for a game, but it's not to everyone's taste. No. Yes. From...
  12. I

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    I too have been waiting for the answer to that question.
  13. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    I do very much like this approach and have used it with important NPCs. (Usually, I abstract all those considerations as part of the d20 result.) It would work with regard to attractiveness also. In some circumstances with some people, appearance can affect DCs and/or provide...
  14. I

    D&D General Hot Take: Uncertainty Makes D&D Better

    I know I'm stepping into a conversation tangential to the point of the thread, but here I go, stepping into a conversation tangential to the point of the thread. I'm seeing Max's point here. With D&D's abstract hit points and combat resolution, any excitement -- hit or miss -- has to come from...
  15. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    It's probably best (IMO of course) to ask players for character descriptions rather than labels like ugly, attractive, or smokin' hot, which don't convey any real information. DMs should do the same for NPCs. I can have my chiseled jaw and sculpted pectorals, and you can decide if you swoon.
  16. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    “I intend to try to convince the priest to give us the holy water, to threaten the ogre, to lie to the mayor about sneaking into the graveyard, and to play fiddle for tips on the street corner after dark. I’ll apply my +0 ability modifier to all those CHA checks and you can tell me the results.”
  17. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    Lanefan seemed to have not noticed that Clint_L was replying directly to a post that did make appearance the entirety of Charisma. I thought the context was important. And no - it’s no problem for me if at your table you allow appearance to be the entirety of Charisma. I’d rather not have...
  18. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    The post that Clint_L was replying to did suggest that appearance could be the whole of Charisma.
  19. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    Okay. I don't see the appeal. That's not a positive addition to the game (IMO). It's an odd notion that good looks alone can make a person influential, persuasive and suited for leadership. It's not reflective of actual human interactions. I don't think it adds anything of value to in-game...
  20. I

    D&D 5E (2024) Change in Charisma Description

    We can imagine an attractive character with a low charisma, and we can imagine an unattractive character with a high charisma. We can imagine a rakish scoundrel who falls for any handsome face, and we can imagine a vain prince who is suspicious of any handsome rivals. We can imagine beholders...
Top