Search results

It could be interpreted as negative. But for a billion dollar company, making grandiose moves is probably pretty much a given.

Like I always say, it takes all kinds. 🤷‍♂️

If it's wrong and should be called out as wrong, then it is exactly a moral issue. That's what the word "moral" means. That's not to say that nobody is being hyperbolic. But the other side of that coin that you haven't mentioned is hyperbole coming from the apologist side of things. As...

Instead of adding any thoughts of my own, I'll just quote what WoTC has to say on the subject:

We didn't have to believe WoTC, we had a legal agreement on how to play ball, and it was all working just fine.

Say what now? Who or what is this message replying to?

Yeah I mean I never could have put any specifics to it but my gut always told me there were some ivory tower bean counters pulling the strings of puppets, that probably few to none of the public faces in this whole farce probably hold much of the blame. I'm sure nobody wanted this, but here we...

The ship has sailed on that one.

No, it woudn't be enough at this point, I agree with that. In my view, nothing would be good enough, the bridge to my wallet has been incinerated. But that's what they need to do.

They can do whatever they want with the new OGL. They can demand our first born child for the next 5 generations. They can promise to pave the world in gold and build bridges out of rainbows. The issue, the only issue, with a capital I is that "deauthorizing" the OGL 1.0a cannot be done. Just...

The issue with a capital I is definitely the deauthorization of 1.0a. Everything else is just muddying the waters. Which might be a little bit by design on wizards' part.

I'm in a career field that goes back to the beginning of recorded history and people think that. ¯\(ツ)/¯

Vaalingrade said: I honestly doubt they know who she is, He said what he said.

WoTC/Hasbro plans to have it under OGL2 (or whatever it ends up being) which is not at all open.

There is one issue and one issue only. Revoking 1.0a. That's it. Everything else is mud. And they have not walked that back.

In 0675 (the first one) it was pretty laughable listening to the lawyer assert with 100% confidence what the authors of the OGL intended and did not intend. Other than the fact that making assumptions about the intentions of the authors of a legal document, when said authors are not around to...

The game is very important to me too but I can't look at it without my stomach turning anymore (this is 3rd time going through this horseshit for me).

At this point I shall just reiterate what has always been my OFFICIAL stance on the whole mess: Jeepers. And you can quote me on that. :D

Statute does not mean license. I wasn't getting that. I get it now. Thank you!