Search results

Unfortunately for what he/she wants to do, the pricing is a necessary evil.

I decided to triple check this, it mentions nothing about price, but it does mention treating it as a scroll for random generation, so I was correct initially. Also this isn't my "logic", this is RAW. My logic would say never give that kind of item to a party member and expect him to pay for it...

That is a different matter entirely and completely covered by RAW as there are rules for it. I even decided to double check the ring of spell storing and it only suggests the meager price of a scroll if it has a spell in it even though the spell storing ring is more powerful than said scroll by...

I vaguely remember some monk PrC that might give you Ki Strike but that may have a requirement of something deeper into monk, I will look into it.

I am taking into account what you are trying to do, and at any point it doesn't matter. The potential of the sword is even more vast than it can be at any point in the near future, the potential is what matters for the cost. If a merchant wants to sell a Ring of Spell Storing with a spell in it...

The absorbed weapons shouldn't affect the cost of the weapon in the slightest, that can be the only fair way to do it. The enchantment on that sword is too powerful and too flexible for a real price to be assigned.

It just worked out for us that it equaled a fresh start, but it can certainly be unbalancing as I can attest.

My DM for my epic campaign is attempting to do something similar right now for pre-existing characters, he is using the Wealth By Level chart and just subtracting what we SHOULD have according to that chart and giving us the difference. Consequently, I end up getting the short end of that stick...

The power of that sword is unlimited, I'd set a base as the average sword that you let them come across plus the additional cost the DMG? suggests for intelligent weapons.

It costs how much it costs. To make their wealth equal you have to account for every penny they have and have spent on permanent items, or if you want to be more accurate, every penny they have spent since creation and have now. Just because you think something should cost more and even if it...

This is why I love this site, a serious discussion about the D&D mechanics of the Power Rangers...

I know that if you have two (or more) DRs that are exactly equal and both "the best" you technically combine them and make them one. In this case that would mean that it would have DR10/magic and adamantine meaning it would need both to break through, unfortunately the spells are both different...

An anti-matter bomb, would be a death effect if it touched you, considering any matter it comes into contact with would be removed from existence violently. Not to mention the "all your dice" thing though obviously a joke, it would be far far more powerful than an atomic bomb.A similar example...

My finding is that it is an okay PrC at best, all it really does is give you some stat boosts and turns you into a warforged.

Probably related to the Ilithid/Mind Flayers, because that is pretty much their attack.

Why would you want to implement this? I think it has potential but the balance really hasn't been tested, not against casters of course, but think about Rogues....They would outstrip Fighters even more depending on the build of course.

All of this discussion has brought up some interesting points but really all we get from it is that people can't be happy with "all meaning all, unless the poison says it ignores immunity". Which as a precedent within the game itself occurs far more than once or twice. In the current game...

I really would suggest speaking with the DM plainly and stating your opinions. It really helped me and my DM is so stubborn that he and I butted heads about making his Epic character not 27 levels of wizard....

It sounds like a fun class, honestly. But something a Cleric for instance should be able to outshine.

Tell him that, that is what casters DO and if he doesn't like it only allow melee builds. My DM of my first campaign was comfortable with us when we all (a party of spellcasters sorcerer,bard,wizard,cleric) were just using direct damage spells, but once I started looking up spells and using...