Search results

Are you playing Gestalt? Also, the DM rejected a Hexblade/Paladin...whatever but not a monk /psi warrior who gets to add Spiked chain as a monk weapon? And in the end somehow concluded that The Drood would be less annoying/ powerful/ whatever the reason for rejecting a charisma build?

and is the best reason why it is slightly better as a gestalt than normal.

Or just a spontaneous casting Wizard with a little bit of fluff that leaves him more open to horrific destruction since he has to protect multiple items instead of just one spellbook...which as a DM I like.

"...but our economy!"

I wasn't aware that a mid level Wizard was a challenge to Epic Characters. (haha) I just chose one at random, but I think that a Living Vault is a fair challenge for anyone who doesn't have a clone of it's owner.

Oh god not again.. All=All just saying that before this devolves. So as to attribute something other than an exasperated sigh. Even though the Vampire Con drain comes from blood it still works via RAW. However since that is their "blood sucking" ability I would call him immune, but that would...

For pure power Arcane archer does blow...but for flavor (which I usually don't care about, but one of my friends plays one and loves it) it is quite interesting. Especially since he is a bard/Arcane Archer mass suggestion at a range of insane is kinda nice.

Except with limiting it to spell slots I see nothing more than pure flavor being the difference.

I am 99.9% sure that anything you gain from class levels remains with you if you change your body in anyway. However I am sure there is probably something that doesn't stay with you, but I don't know of one. Quick Reply: No, it doesn't. *Assuming you are referring to your BASE saves.

Your DM doesn't understand the concept of gestalt, I assume. It is to give you more power, quicker. It is not to make you feel useless even earlier in the game and finally get a reward that by RAW you should have had 4 levels ago. Although again rogue/scout is a terrible idea.

Thanks for the great idea for crits and crit fumbles, I'm sure my players will love me for doing that! :D

The PHB does not a Splatbook make.

Make it an erudite it will probably make more sense, otherwise the ML boosts plus the psion's "domains" would be a bit much...

“”We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.”?

Can't compete with that logic, also nerf barbarians and rogues they do too much damage too.

Exactly my point.

The monk jibber-jabber aside, Removing caster levels would make so many spells boring and make spell casters even more over-powered in that everyone would chose the broken spells that can't be harmed by this "nerf" and no one would go the fun route of creating blocks of solid ice that take up...

I also made that mistake recently but in the bonus HD made it advance. No players seemed to care that I had a Gargantuan snake that was effectively a grapple spell, but the DM sure did. I fixed the problem anyway by awakening it. It should definitely be spelled out in a very noticeable way that...

Personally, I like to think that any spell (especially a transmutation spell) that doesn't explicitly say what it transforms about you to achieve the desired effect to be left up to the individual player's creativity. Because I see magic as similar to science (in D&D), you can reach the same...

I allow everything under the sun, more variety is more fun in some cases. I not only have the common thought of most DMs "if you can use it, don't forget so can I", I also flip it around and say anything I homebrew/use so can you. Besides, most of my players aren't power gamers anyway and the...