Search results

Darn. I was hoping to read his heartfelt praise for me!

I'll like go with that in addition, but is this there no "mechanical claw" graft?

Yes, and no. The other arm is basically like a triple croosbow, which I don't remember the book of. The creature should be huge, just by the way. That sounds cool, but, you can't have grafts from more than one type of creature, if I'm not mistaken.

I clicked quote, to say something witty, but, actually, yes for everything but alignment......Now to wait for him to take my bait, and start an arguement!

We should make a 10 Commandments of D&D, and then impose them upon people who believe otherwise, because they're just misguided, and need guidance.

On the other hand, a wrecking ball is a more modern object, and generally made of a denser material, and therefore, significantly heavier when both are at the same dimensions.

Well, it shouldn't, but my DM and I couldn't find something disputing it, other than physics, which the game has problems with.

Well, rolling 4 sixes implies you took the full brunt of the wrecking ball/catapault. Should this character be able to take a wrecking ball at that speed that hits him with uncanny magnitude? If so, then 25 would be right. 15 would make more sense if he can handle "the average wrecking ball," so...

As the title implies. I'm already statting it, but I'm looking for some grafts. Most likely, they'll be construct grafts, but I can't seem to find the right ones. The grafts should be appropriate for a CR 10/11, and it's going to be a "boss." Here's a picture for referrence. Also, a nifty...

I once made a dual-hand crossbow gunner, based on the video game character of my username. He had some things that aren't essential to hand crossbow combat, for flavor reasons. He was a Wizard 1 (Abrupt Jaunt ACF)/ Targeteer Fighter 2/ Feat Rogue 2/ Swordsage everything else. He had Crossbow...

The base cost of the weapon should be, without enhancements, about +11. +1 for starters, and the enhancement itself should be +10 since it has unlimited potential, and should be unachievable by non-epic characters.

I know it's been stated several times already, but can we just drop the combat roles entirely? As much as my love of the tactical aspects of 3.5 would imply that I would love 4e, the very concept of adding something out of World of Warcraft appauls me.

4000 is munchkinry.

One book! I don't have a problem carrying the weight in one place instead of three. With a well detailed index, everything will be easy to find, instead of rummaging through multiple D&D 3.5 books, as much of a diehard as I am for the installment. I don't think it should stop details at a...

Kobolds.

I'm neutral. While I am quite eager to get a look at it, I'm apprehensive. While I'm glad they seem to be bringing back earlier-edition esque vancian casting. What I'm hoping for are A) something like the SRD, for starters, and B) a book for alternate Rule Systems, like 3e's Unearthed Arcana...

The text of Time Stop doesn't say that. I'm not saying it's logical, I'm saying, by the very text, it works unless you can find another text that states otherwise.

I'm genuinely curious to see evidence of this. I'm not calling you out or anything, I want to know if this is viable (from anyone) so that I may try it.

Actually, what it says is "other creatures are invulnerable to your attacks and spells; you cannot target such creatures with any attack or spell. A spell that affects an area and has a duration longer than the remaining duration of the time stop have their normal effects on other creatures...

Related question; If Time Stop is in effect, and I drop the said rock, putting aside whether or not it works, does it count as a threatening action against my enemy, otherwise prohibited by the spell, if I'm targetting the square, and not the person?