Search results

We don’t know but we are guess 4 per class so that changes cleric wizard fighter and rouge drastically.

Even more hard disagree He waded through warriors with ease… but the epic warrior “Galen” killed him with a pencils ✏️ is a myth in the making.

I did something like that in 3.5. A simulacrum that I dominated and scryed. The DM at no point found me being unkillable (in my Demi plane full of contingency spells artifacts and with a dozen hidden clones) to mean he could not challenge me. Death isn’t the only lose condition it’s just the...

To my epic level fighter he is just another notch on his belt I will put an exception for true divinity and rare unique creatures (tarasque) but not devil lords and avatars BUT even then it can’t just be “a magic weapon” then it has to be a god killer weapon.

Again if the proxy dies the warlock still loses

Hard disagree Saying “he killed him with a bleeping pencil” says more about the warrior in my mind. Riddick joker John wick all have these kinds of feats. So too does bullseye ultimate Hawkeye (you never miss and I never loose…if you know you know)

What a magic trick

I disagree with you a lot but I agree here. You have a diffrent opinions and even if I dislike your way of conveying it I don’t think gaslighting is the right fit.

I am a BIG proponent of POWERFUL magic… like giving rare and very rare items out at low levels and legendary plus at mid. But giving fewer. You won’t find 10 +1 short swords but you might find a +3 keen flame tonge short sword by 5th level

Yes this is what I meant to say. So if you picked up a defender at 3rd level it would become a +1 defender but that same sword at 20th is a +5 (or 3 in 5e) defender.

I think there was something called inherent bonus. I don’t remember if it added the magic bonus or only counted as it but we did it for a bit in 5e too

No not really that was spell check and fat thumbs. I meant change

The fact that you think posting thoughts you disagree with and discussing things shifting to the more popular topic is “bad behavior “ say more about you then my posts

Normally it doesn’t. We normally know by pre order what it will be like and if it will work with the most up to date rules. Again not fear at all.

Threads. If I say any optniom or DM call or even just a bit of flower language to describe something. It has a chance to derail into arguments. Again this is why I have not been posting but I am trying to get up the nerve to do so again. Yeah but some turn into insults and some turn into...

No. If you only apply 1/3 and even then only in the broadest point calling it FUD seems (to me) be be dismissive and insulting to people taking a wait and see attitude. And again if the two stores and my personal (that totall over Laos with 1 store) small sample shows anything is it is a not...

It is hard to gauge.

No one side CAN hijack it. It only BECOMES the topic when BOTH sides engage. Yup and to me it so far looks like 1e/2e or 3e/3.5 It isn’t. Unless you make major changes (take away background features and put feats in its place, take away pact magic and make half caster, change lists of...

To see what happens. At BEST it is U. The center word. Uncertainty

Here. I am playing them. I have 3 times posted playtest reports 2 of them turned into fights. Right now I am trying to get up the nerve to post games 2-5 of a playtest and trying to figure out how to without turning it into a fight