Search results

That isn’t what I said. I said they are riding the line trying to do both and as such failing at both. It has nothing to do with lying. I guess it is being deceptive but it is being deseptive trying to have there cake and eat it too. Again making up some crazy argument and trying to pretend I...

How many points do you get for insulting people by claiming they are going for points?

What about subclasses that reference old bard inspire? Or even just ones that don’t have enough sun class spaces?

Funny how as many people think that the 2024 class or fear or spell is a replacement as think it is a new option you can use either and some (maybe not you) think it’s both depending on what makes the “it’s not a true edition break” argument better at the time.

The funny part is that my name isn’t a reference to being a man. I lost my username in a computer and board shuffle and could not reaccess it so I on the spot grab the name of a funny cartoon from the 90s. I am a man (soon to be married to a woman) but yes something tells me I would not be...

So we have tried new warlock a few different ways. It is not the worst class but it is not as fun as the old version is what most of us agreed. One person is making a gestalt of the two to try. So far she has pact cantrips and pact magic but also the extra spells know from subclass and 1/ long...

One playtest we tried fell apart (a few have) but one of the hurdles was one player wanted spell sniper eldritch blast and for it to scale at character level (since that is what the 2014 PHB said) but the woman trying warlock out was upset that was “her thing” since it was a class feature

Okay so when a 2024 adventure references mastery or a new condition/altered condition how does this work?

Divine doesn’t feel too off but the smite spells are weird. The ranger getting more druid spells is fine but giving Druid ranger ones feels iky. Arcane just is TOO all over the place

My honest belief is that this new game PHB will do the same just without the benfit of having the title of a new edition

This is the best example of why I think it’s a new edition in late 80s early 90s I got the 2e PHB and we had to teach ourselves how to play. It was 94ish before I met anyone who had played 1e. However once I did I found many of them that brought over ideas and concepts (the assassin the monk and...

Yeah just like 3.5 or 3e to 5e spells won’t convert without some DM elbow greese . It’s another way this is just a new edition by any other name

Oh okay I guess if you don’t see it there is no reason to talk about it any more

This reminds me of when I was younger going to bars. A group of guys and gals that were not always the nicest when we drank. But 1 guy was a foot shorter and 100lbs lighter than the average… 7 out of 10 times you know who people wanted to fight if they were mad at all of us? I don’t know...

Time. No TTRPG has lasted longer then d&d and it did it by changing every few years

Yes it is (from what we have seen) Both sides seem to suffer from “no matter what I am right”

Again I can’t imagine many people who think “it is still 5e” is misleading would say the same if it was 5.5 or 5e essential or 5e red or 5e Felix. My understanding (and my issue) is not “they didn’t name it what I wanted” it s “we need a break from the 2014 PHB so people understand it isn’t...

Did 2e take any kind of hit in sales? I was under the impression that 2e did well?

Some people already stopped buying. Some people would (and have) doubled down on buying the last of the edition.

I think that moving wish up to “10th level spell” is perfect.