Search results

Then why a new PHB with all the classes races feats and some spells and conditions overhauled?

I am pretty sure they could name it what ever they want as long as they label it and those of us calling it out would be happy

So it is a new game but not a new game.

clarity. The ability to say where 1 set of rules end and the next begins. You look at a bird or talk with someone at a con and one is useing 1 set of rules the other is useing the other both calling it 5e is muddy

Tbh I am just pushing to change them from warlock cantrips to A) pact cantrips or B ) warlock class features.

Are you old enough to remember new coke and coke classic?

Let us know when SODD goes up on Kickstarter.

I mean it MIGHT be super easy to telll by cover but that is a guess either way until we get art previews Yup I called both options out in my survey. It wasn’t asked to “play dumb” it was asked cause we didn’t have a good answer so wanted to leave it up to the DM but the dm looked like a dear...

If you CANNOT break the game with wish then is it really wish?

That is what I put in my feed back

Where I still think it’s dumb I think it is always preped as a bonus spell

That is a perfectly fine house rule. I won’t even say I would not do the same… but that isn’t how the game is written.

I have never seen it but I have heard stories of people trying to root out shape shifters this way “this spell only targets enemies, so let’s see if you are my ally or attacked and replaced them”

Hey that misinformation worked. People who started playing in 2016+ think 4e didn’t sell, and was a game where all the classes where spell casters… a year or two ago I had a kid (okay younger then me maybe not a kid) ask me if 4e was like Mage in WoD if everyone just played different apell casters

Someone when this started called it as “no matter what they call it we need a way to say what books we use at cons and on boards”. I didn’t think about HS (I graduated during 2e) but yeah. In the lunch room when the new kid comes in he or she will have to explain what type of d&d they play and...

I don’t do console gaming anymore but when I buy things for friends and family I need a flow chart

That would make it worse. You need to have a way to explain what book goes with what book. As you can see if you visit my post asking about warlock cantrips we already have people saying the spells in the playtest can’t be used on the list of spells for the class they are labeled for.

At some point we have to admit that if they upgrade with each board replaced to be an iron aircraft carrier that by the end it is no longer the same.

It’s in a official book they say is compatible and says warlock cantrip…I don’t understand why people don’t understand how that can be read as “a cantrip a warlock can take” But if enough people say “don’t worry NOBODY could make that mistake” why would they fox it?

Because if you change the list of spells the 2014 classes pull from you can’t use the 2014 classes as is