Search results

5E probaly plays better with similar character types than any edition before it. Some would call this a good feature, others not. Many in the past Hated that they had to have these different character types or the game would not play well.

one of the things that ticks me off about 5E adventures is the lack of opportunities to find spell books.

Oh yeah. I understand the process lol

woah. There’s no way fighter could have been dpr in 2E. Everyone swears to me wizards were god on these forums.

I always maxed out F/R traps as fast as possible in 2E. It was a very life saving skill in those early editions. We went though dungeons with the precision of a special forces unit looking for any danger possible.

I just wish people le would embrace the idea that a healer is what a cleric is. It’s like playing a fighter that doesn’t want to fight or a rogue that doesn’t want to stealth and sneak attack.

I sure wouldn’t want to play without a fighter or paladin in a group. I am also tired of everyone wanting to sit back at ranged.

I am since every freaking other spell caster gets to do it. And they get more hp, more armor, better weapon selection, and better class features. How can an abjurer even keep up with a paladins protection power. And abjurer is the definition of protective magic to name one example.

It’s kind of what magic does. Teleport, charm, conjure things, open barriers, divine, create stuff.

To me imho giving expertise to other classes was a mistake Except under very specialized cases like arcana for wizards and religion for clerics and musical instruments and history for bards and wilderness skills for rangers. A blanket expertise for all classes is just a mistake.

I could Never grasp why not just start players out at 2nd or 3rd level if you don’t like hit points at 1st level. It seems to be the simplest solution that keeps everything balanced in a way that you don’t have to change other things.

That really ticks me off too.

I think u nailed it on the head. But if you try to get rid of the thief class you will really piss people off.

I think wizards get more spell options because that is just the nature of wizards and magic. There’s always new spells to discover and hidden esoteric spells and forbidden or secret knowledge. But people got pissed at pathfinder for too many feats and options and they are kind of careful about...

I don’t use feats except with first level variant humans. And I have had zero problem with fighter participation outside combat. It would be cool if they would give the fighter some appropriate perks outside combat. But if you want a solution before d&d 6E comes out for your table then feats is...

Sounds to me like to fighter should be merged with the warlord. Not a bad thing either.

What kind of things do people want to give the fighter to do outside combat?

are your fighters sitting around and just waiting for combat to start. Mine are searching for clues, interviewing people for investigations, building alliances, and many other things. I am cool with giving them something else. But gee whiz.

I would like to see something else given to them. But to say the class hasn’t changed since 1974 or that there are no things that can be done out of combat with them is bulkshit. Take the healer feat. Take stealth. Take persuasion. A dex based fighter is an easy build. A fighter can still be...

Oh please. They can be stealthy, they can be healers, they can be good at people skills in this edition. It would be cool if they added something but maybe that aren’t good at anything because they are only being built to be good in combat. I played a cool barbarian with a 16 charisma that had...