Search results

Henadic Theologian, your 2nd comment isn't showing up correctly. Edit: timing of comment. I thought the following paragraph was interesting:

I didn't look through every option, maybe about 1/3, but from what I can tell, nothing that worked is glitchy now. So once those are resolved, it should be all good.

Plus, for owners of an in-house streaming service, the best deal is ironically for people to subscribe but never stream, since that provides payment, but doesn't require providing service. (every streaming session for someone already subscribed is an added cost but no added benefit) Which is...

On page 13, where it says that D&D and Transformers are up (+74% & +83% respectively), the category they are in 'Franchise Brands' is down 5%. Combined with the WOTC specific parts from my prior comment, this means that D&D isn't heavily impactful (yet) on the revenue, even with getting close to...

First of all, thanks for linking the report. I read through the whole of the report, paying special emphasis to Wizards of the Coast, and it looks like even though franchise performance for D&D is up, WOTC net revenue and profit are down. Page 34 (3-month period): "Wizards of the Coast and...

True, but without the studio, there is likely less control.

Ah. Well, I had to go looking for an explanation of "production asset impairment charge", and the results all pointed one way. I recommend explaining the specialized terminology yourself in the future, just to be clear. I will edit my prior comment.

Are you meaning the quotes about revenue and eOne, or just the impairment? Btw, thanks for adding more context.

Edit: removed incorrect definition information. Some further details from the article: So, it looks like is expecting total revenue to drop this year, but not as much as was estimated. Selling eOne might also be a bad sign overall for D&D media, since even if more is produced, the producers...

Looks like you got most of them, just leaving 3: assorted features - 10 ft. reach - displays as absolute; isn't it on your turn only? I have this one ^ separate because I am unsure about it. I thought that such a benefit must be from the Bugbear, so it only applied on your turn; but at least in...

These are from IMDB, and they aren't lower. You listed only the box office, I listed the films' budgets, and how each films box office compares to its budget.

For context: Honor Among Thieves budget = $150m (box office was about 138.67% of budget) Quantumania budget = $200m (box office was about 238% of budget) Multiverse of Madness budget = $200m (box office was about 477.5% of budget Love and Thunder budget = $250m (box office was about 304% of...

Ok, applying the 12% figure and accounting for the UK, as well as Paramount's (presumed) share of cost and box office: $75 million production + $60 million marketing = $135 million cost ~ $93 million domestic box office x 12% (estimate of Canada quantity) = ~ $11 million global box office minus...

What do you think is a fair percent of the domestic for Canada? 20% or in the 12-15% range?

Thanks for the source. bedir than, where was 5% from? Is that the typical percent that the UK and Canada occupy?

Let me try phrasing it this way: what source says Hasbro only has 5%? I didn't see that in the article, so I don't know if I missed it, or if it is from a different source.

Where is it said that Hasbro has only 5% of distribution? Just asking, not accusing.

It doesn't matter if I understood, what matters is if the statement was clear or muddied. Again, if you are quoting someone, the entire quote must be of that person. In this case, you are quoting 2 people, but only speaking about 1, which means that by definition, it isn't clear. Below is the...

I am not making any such assumption, simply addressing costs vs earnings of the movie. How that breaks down by individual studios/companies is something that we don't know, and cannot math out. Further, since publically traded corporate entities will absolutely avoid publically stating that...

No, it wasn't. Here is what you said: By saying what you did in red, you are claiming that what follows is all said by the person you are referencing. Here is the wording of the article: Green is everything before your quote, and yellow is the only part of the text about his statements.