Search results

Well then I misunderstand you. You say you can create everything except Inspirational Healing, which is healing that is non-magical. Most of the players think Warlord is buildable and we even have one in our party and she played warlord since 4e war released. She is very happy about it and says...

So you want what you have but non-magical?

Storm or Bladesinger.

Only ki abilities that are explicitly magical are suppressed in an antimagic field. A DM could decide that they're all magical, probably the same way he could decide elves are magical and evaporate in AMZ or that spells aren't magical at all. He is the DM.

Possibly both of the above

That is 4e.

If everyone would get class they enjoyed in previous editions, we would have hundreds.

I will answer that in the "Are you AB-SOLUTELY sure you don't want this?!" warlord thread, which I am assuming to be opened sometimes within this week and feature many examples on what we are missing.

Cleric's heal - "I who served you well ask for help!" Druid's heal - "Anmnsdgjnsdjsfdnm vlkofdsk" Bard's heal - "Annie, are you OK? So, Annie, are you OK? Are you OK, Annie?" Warlord's heal - "You are all my childreeen!" Yea, we definitely need a handbook for this.

Your game, your homebrewed rules.

Most people on these forums are decent in English and as such their signatures don't really mean much, because they won't be buying the Japanese version, even if translated. Best look for fan translations, even though illegal, there are many.

Let s just make a class who can heal same as cleric, but non-magical, do damage same as fighter, have inspirations and skills like bard, Help as a free action with 300 yards range and have battlemasters maneuvers with 9 superior dice regenerating per round where every maneuver cast time is "one...

Not a fan. Good for some MC builds though.

I would have NEVER thought of it that way. Ever.

Luckily FS wont get released in its current state.

The bells are made of plate armor scrap. Next. Yes, fluffing doesn't work if you're trying to find loopholes.

Making spells non-magical isnt purely cosmetic - I agree, I said that like 4 times. I have absolutely NO idea what you mean by the rest. Everything I said still applies. If you disagree, I would like an example where it s purely cosmetic and it doesnt work. My example with plate armor is...

You didnt read what I said. "You are describing "crunching" which is bending rules to make something different." "Changing magical healing to non-magical is already a crunch and that is where your DM has to approve." Changing keywords and mechanics is crunching and as such is effectively...

In what case it wouldn't work? "Fluffing" something to look different is what I described. You are describing "crunching" which is bending rules to make something different. Re-fluffing is perfectly fine and has absolutely no effect on the game. (i.e. Playing Human with Elf stats) Changing...

Aside from the fact that inspirational and magical healing differs only in "counterspelled and anti-magiced", which can be fixed by the DM no problem... you can create fighter human with half-elf racials running around half naked with plate armor stats with a magical lightsaber scythe shooting...