Search results

I guess I just don't see the need to address it. Its absence from 2024 books (and likely all non-setting books moving forward) does address the issue as far as I am concerned. I mean my games simple don't hang on every word and interpretation from WotC and I can't imagine many really do.

First, I specifically mentioned the 5e24 rules in my post, so yes that is what I was talking about. If you don't find it relevant they specifically took out the language about the Weave than there is nothing I an see other than I disagree. 5e24 and 5e14 are one system/edition, but that doesn't...

You must be speaking of the 2014 PHB, because it is not in the 2024 one (pg 205 is a page of Feats in the 2024 PHB). As my post noted I was talking about the 5e24 rules.

No, it has been completely removed from the 2024 books as I noted in later post.

While it may not be a bad thing, it isn't exactly a good thing either. I was just notice the issue / my faults. Gone are the days I had time to try/run three different systems in the same year (bless you '80s)!

Well we modified 5e in the first couple years to be our ideal system, so we don't really have anyone looking for another system either. That contributes to the issue as well. But again, my points was one of time not content. I don't have the time and energy to investigate other systems...

Oh I agree (and I have done a lot of that), but that is completely different from running a game in another system IME. We borrowed ideas from other games for frequently in the firt few years of 5e until we got a system we love, but now it is pretty stable. I really only go looking if we are...

I mean, realistically I feel this statement is true for about every class and monster in D&D, heck any RPG I've ever seen. I don't think that realization gets us much.

Yes - that does seem to be a trend IME as well!

Perhaps I missed but how is magic dependent on the Weave of Mystra? I mean she doesn't even exist in my setting! ;) Seriously though: I don't see any reference to the Weave in the PHB Chapter 7: Spells (I didn't check every spell though). I don't see any reference to the Weave in the Wizard...

It is alien in your mind, that doesn't mean it is alien to others or inherently alien at all.

I know it is out there, the poster I responded to seemed to imply that was the only new 5e content out there - and that has not been my experience.

I don't know that marketability is much of an issue. It seems to me there are lot of ways to market a new setting, including Dark Sun. Ease of design definitely could be in issue. WotC has previously not shown a lot of interesting in design settings. However, that is clearly changing. Those...

I will disagree with that. I don't feel D&D needs psionics at all. I don't mind if people want and enjoy psionics, but it is definitely not a need for the game. If it was a need, then I don't think 5e would have done so well over the past 10+ years!

I have in the past, I just don't have the time and energy to do that now. Also, I should explain that I, and my group, have never had more fun roleplaying (over the past 35+/- years) than with our current homebrew version of 5e. So that also acts as a deterrent to exploring new systems.

I have not run into "more furries, the better" content for 5e, but, like other systems, I am would mostly gloss over those as well. However, it is seems you misunderstood the thrust of my realization. It is a time issue for me, not a content or excitement issue. I always find new ideas exciting...

After looking through this article I just realized something about myself (and perhaps the hobby). I just gloss over the non-5e products. While I might have the time to adapt new material to my 5e game, I don't have the time or bandwidth to take on a whole new system. I see a lot of interesting...

In general me too. However, I am finding that by leaning into psions as spellcasters I am finding them much more acceptable.

That is irrelevant with regard to the common trope of hand gestures, facial expressions, and other somatic components being part of psionics for a long time. You don't like them =/= bad design. I was not talking about need to perceive the manifestation of psionic powers, that was someone else.

What is bad to you, isn't universally bad. Look, my preference is that the only spellcasting class is the wizard and all other magic using classes use a different mechanic. But I understand that it is my preference and not testament to good or bad design. I think you might want to reflect on that.