Search results

Rolemaster 1980. Man those crit and fumble chart....00 slip on an invisible turtle and decapitate yourself.

B&N still has it on the shelves.

I just retired. Re-read the whole series during Feb.

I thought (honestly) that Wizard's First Rule was pretty good. It was every book in the series after that, that made me think "this is really horrible writing and stuff".

Still use reaction rolls on occasion. Was amusing and fun for all, when the NPC they needed to rent a ship from took an immediate dislike to the party as a whole.

Quoted for cosmic truth. This is the Way. So say we all.

Oddly enough, I taught a new group of players just last month. We made their character sheets, and I asked them "Do you have a good concept of your character in your head?" They said yes. I said turn your sheets face down on the table. I said "You are travelling with a caravan, slowly...

Yeah, I have a lot of monster books also. And still mainly use the main one. I will look through the others for unique things, or things that fit my world mythos (like void dragons) but usually stick with the standards.

Aren't we all, in a way?

In case you like metal with your readings of Moorcock.

Yeah I read it also (cause work in bookstore). The Young Adults and Women raving about it were surprised when I said "Its kinda mid, and predictable from like page five. Decent, but not as good as popularity is making it seem". I am curious about those enemies that appeared near the end though.

We had rangers from an arid wasteland that we added create food and water to their spell list. Flavored as scrounging and digging in the right spot.

Hmmm, I feel a lot of the gems of power series were the better ones. The early books remind me of the pulps and Moorcock, etc.

Butlerian Jihad?

Anybody read early David Gemmel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gemmell#Works

I voted for Greyhawk....but would have chosen Tanelorn.

Correct, thanks for asking.

Rifts seemed to do well with their psionics being the same framework as spells in the 90s.

Not whom you asked, but: Common is flavored as a language that would work anywhere, if you changed continents, you could still communicate. A local "common" language, such as Gondorian, is assumed to remain fairly local, with no expectation of communicating in far off lands. So for local...