Search results

Hilarious point about the “don’t need combat to finish” part they touted when the book released. It’s true, you don’t need to fight but sometimes to avoid a fight you have to make some SHADY decisions. It’s sort of hilarious. “Sure you don’t have to be violent. But your going to for sure enable...

Your changing your original statement which was that this has been the case since 2014 and now stating this has been the case in the last 3-4 years. Ok. Let’s talk about the last 3-4 years. 2018: neverwinter Nights enhanced edition released. First of the Original Adventures Reincarnated...

Rise of Tiamat, Baldurs Gate, Tomb of Annihilation, princes of the apocalypse, storm kings thunder, curse of Strahd, dungeon of the mad mage: all attempts to appeal to more established players. Even their new adventures are chock full of Easter eggs and references to npcs and places and events...

what square pegs were forced for Strixhaven?

So they thought, until the great Malystryx appeared….: :)

That’s me I’m this person

I think he means “the sentiment is the important part of that statement, not necessarily the root.”

Oooooo I need to buy planescape now, if only to be privy to some sweet sweet TSR drama. is tenebrous (?) gygax, revised from his “death” and secretly mucking things up? Is the great world tree a tree they all ate lunch under?!

What is an impure conversion?

I’ve been saying this ever since the first print run of The Odessey! It’s not new to print it we all know the story stop giving us what we already had, HOMER. Not even his story anyway. People have no idea what they were doing buying that and what they would end up doing to gamers in the 2020’s

Before someone says “ah but you said WOTC before not specifically d&d!” I just want it clear that one of those settings is less than a year old, another less than 4, another less than 10, and all four only recently have become a playable setting book. To imply that any of these are old or to...

1. I don’t think it’s a bad idea, the sorcerer moon subclass is just fine. In general I want the moon chart though 2. I make my players who are arcane casters keep track of the moon chart, I give them a copy. It also helps them to double as party time keeper. It’s been working out really well...

You are like the second person to read “not a strong influence” as “doesn’t have one someone prove me wrong quick” Emphasis strong. Emphasis it doesn’t overwhelm the setting, the plane of air has a much stronger influence considering the most famous city in the setting.

I hope they do it like they did it in 3.5: the phases of the moon affect all arcane magic across the board. When one moon is full, certain spells get stronger. When it’s not in the sky, those spells get weaker. I use that system in my 5e Dragonlance game and it works just fine

Since paladin wasn’t available in the setting you couldn’t use it (I mean. You could. Whatever) and it was designed to effectively make the paladin in the setting cause it got everything a paladin got. But it boiled down to the fastest way you could get to knight of the rose was at like your...

Tabaxi are my bane. Always annoyingly problematic. Always.

Mathematically the capstone for the prestige class for knight of the rose couldn’t be reached without hitting level 21!

Untrue. I am only here for the Greygem. Give me ball of chaos or give me death, WotC cowards. Joking you are spot on.

(Looks around at thread that has derailed multiple times because a demographic can’t get past the words “fey Wild” and “supernatural”) yeah what a silly generation wotc is going after.

Eberron doesn’t have a strong fey influence, and if all we get for fey in Dragonlance is Kender I’d say we made it out pretty unscathed