Search results

Plus, there isnt infinite space in the phb so some things must be shunted elsewhere. Or at least that is what they told us ;)

So if I have weapon focus in longswords and then get a longsword +1 my weapon focus no longer works? Or, even better, enlarge person. The sword damage die changed, so the feat must no longer apply by your logic. After all, that is essentially the same progression. You are saying that because...

That sounds, to me, almost exactly like the last choice there dcollins. 'yes, but I dissalow it in my games'. After all, just because you dont allow the players to pick feats from the monstrous manual (which I do not understand at all, considering the various classes which can use them in...

Gah, triple post, but they are all seperate thoughts ;/ Sorry all. Are you looking at the correct table infiniti? There is the monk chart which assumes medium, and then there is another chart which shows small and large next to one another. At level 4 it shows the monks d8 going to 2d6, just...

As I have said in most, if not all, of these threads there is a direct corallary: Exotic weapon proficiency. Generally the exotic weapon is 'better' somehow than the martial counterpart. One of the ways that it can be better is having an increased damage die. That looks exactly the same to me...

What are you talking about? The feat makes you treat the damage as if you were one size category larger. The monk is of level X and so qualifies for a certain level of unarmed strike, and if he was medium before he now does damage as if he was large. There is no 'one time deal' or 'advancement...

Depends on the prereqs of course ;) I feel that weapon finesse is a worthless enough feat that it is a pretty harsh prereq.. I also feel that it should be automatic with any weapon that is finesseable... but working with the rules as written useing it as a prereq to the other effect seems like...

I dont see a problem. Give it weapon finesse as a prereq and then after spending two feats you have mostly replaced what str does for you. But of course you can only use it with specific weapons and it took two feats to get there. Two feats to use one stat instead of another for most of its...

Another one of these? ;) As before, I believe that the RAW makes it work pretty explicitly. So to take this feat we need a few things. First, we need to have a natural weapon. Second, we need a BAB of +4. I dont think anyone has any issues with the second. As for the first, we need to do a...

They are in complete divine, under 'relics' I believe.

Dominate monster does last a little longer... ;) In my own games I treat the summoned creatures as perfect ideals of what that creature is and represents. It doesnt actually exist anywhere else, that is why it is always at full health and has all of its abilities to draw from. Basically it...

wizards are not under the alignment restrictions generally (you'd likely need some sort of prc to do that). So the wizard is free to cast any spells that he knows with whatever descriptors that he likes.

Because Good is Dumb.

Edit: I'll just pm instead.

But then that cleric cant cast shapechange.. which would trump all of those abilities ;)

Well, then I disagree. I have seen plenty of monks not take ina (too many other feats that they want) and I have seen about half of the druids in games I have been in and run not take natural spell (same/similar reasoning). Ina isnt any better than a fighter type taking exotic weapon prof for...

I think you should make a poll about it ;)

I guess nifft has me on ignore ;)

Now, I personally let people who only qualify some of the time to get a feat so long as they state that they are taking extra time to practice for it. Out of normal game time of course. But, as written, spells and items will work just fine. Long term ones are much easier to adjucate, for...

As far as I know that is not grammatically correct because neither apples nor pears are designated as 'poisonous fruit'. The logic chain you tried to make work before is just nonsense. It doesnt work that way in the english language. I have already made a comment about this in the other...