Search results

Humorous end credits things which aren’t setups for new movies have been a Hollywood tradition for decades. It just Marvel which turned it into ‘mandatory setup for the next movie.’

Yup!

I have to agree. He never really got his hero moment —repeatedly beaten by Lex’s goons, the JG were the ones to beat the Godzilla, etc. He felt more like Rocky—outmatched but kept getting up. I could have used a big solo save or something. But I get that they were squeezing a lot in.

If you're talking to your lawyers about this, why are you asking us? Always, always, defer to your lawyers on legal stuff. Not the internet. That's what you're paying them for.

Note, folks, that Product Identity (PI) and Intellectual Property (IP) are two different things.

They haven't done.

Then Product Identity is basically irrelevant to you. Just go by fair use guidelines and you'll be fine.

I just came from the Superman thread where you were chastising somebody for posting their opinion of a film, to this thread where you are chastising people for vaguely defined offences. If you think somebody has broken the rules, please report it. Otherwise, please dial back the thread policing...

I mean, he is different than an AI that vomits images based on prompts. I get that he finds the work creatively unsatisfying, but he is no way the same as an AI that vomits images based on prompts.

There isn't a 2014 OGL, just the OGL v1.0a published in 2000. It is still a valid license for content which was originally released under it. If you are using the OGL, then the list of Product Identity is found in the relevant SRDs (3.x, 5.1, Pathfinder Reference Document, A5ESRD, etc.) you are...

Not all heroic companions are cute unicorns or tiger kittens. Some, like the spiders and beetles are creepy; others, like the animated objects and cogs are mechanical; and then of course, there's the undead--skeletons and zombies which are sure to appeal to the necromancers in the party. Pets &...

The first season was stronger than the second.

We have a long thread and news article about this, so I’ll close this one.

Courts do not define the meaning of words used in conversation. The word ‘malice’ is an English word with, like every word, meaning and usage outside of a courtroom. If they were only allowed to use legal terminology it would be pretty difficult for people to talk to each other.

Rhetorical question. I was making a point, not asking a question. :)

You could also ask is an original piece of art of greater value than a fake or a replica? If so, why? Why is a Van Gogh more valued than a photocopy I made of a tree? Or, more simply: why is human expression valued?

I haven’t watched the video but the short answer is: nobody knows, including the video maker. We can speculate all day long but without any data all we’re doing is making stuff up.