Search results

I think we were also waiting to see if Quinn's cosmic omens negate one of the attacks that hit him. Otherwise, I guess he's down for the count.

They have “good” written in next to alignment. :)

They provide variety. Sometimes the monsters are good. This doesn't mean they won't attack you sometimes, maybe even as often as evil monsters. They might not know the PCs are good after all (if they even are).

The crosses are for when they want to hide the truth of who they really work for.

Here's another:

Beorn's Hall:

I think this one is cool:

Probably the most iconic of the bunch:

Here's another:

This is one of my favorites:

I'm not sure if I follow this line of reasoning. Who decides it's more valuable to be the guy who remembers things about magic and the other planes than it is to be the guy who remembers things about the natural world, or the guy who can navigate, track, hunt, and forage, or the guy who can keep...

Is this for a D&D game? 5th Edition? If so, you are correct that "you believe them" is not the best way to narrate a successful result of an NPC's check. In fact, if a PC's belief is in doubt, rather than call for a check, the player has the authority to decide one way or the other because they...

I think this is highly group dependent. The DM and players are empowered to make any skill relevant and valuable.

It's a fine skill for a character who succeeds in social interactions by making threats. I really don't see how it can be considered worse than other skills.