Search results

ugh, I really hate that about the others, work on your layout…

why not use a shortbow instead? I’d much rather say your sword-guy also is good with the bow instead… Have your spinning attack for AoE, heck even a ground-stomp, but a sword that takes double duty as a ranged weapon, why?

they both publish one setting only, it would be weird for them to have options that they exclude from that setting

I agree, but that also means they are no worse, just less popular.

it goes further than that, you get XP rewards for playing the DS races according to their description ("The notes given on roleplaying each race are also very important, since a character earns additional individual experience point awards when played according to these racial descriptions")...

moreso than they do with 5.5?

yes, for one that was 4e, 15 or so years ago, for another it already says ‘but if a player wants to play a different race, here is how to accommodate this’. I am not expecting them to ban races and leave their inclusion entirely up to the DM now. They at most will already spell out how to allow...

not sure it takes a feeling for that, the CR announcement should he enough

Blaming a corporation for trying to create a popular product that their audience likes is futile too though… Realistically the option was a compatible revision or nothing new at all (at most a consolidation of PHB, XGtE, and TCoE into a new PHB with new art), an incompatible 6e was not in the...

yes, but if level 3 is already beyond my ‘comfort level’ then that does not leave much of a level range for me to work with ;) If @GobHag wants to start at level 13 and go to 30, let them

that is fine, but it was clearly a goal for the new version and you cannot blame the designers for meeting the requirements

of course it is, this is about where the starting and end points are, not about there not being any growth

in your account settings, check the ‘Ignoring’ settings (bottom right)

didn’t want to quote the whole text. I don’t like quoting a hundred lines for a two line reply. I was referencing parts outside my quote in my reply, so I expected it to be clear that I am responding to the entire post, not just the quoted part.

the premise always was to release something compatible. I would have liked them to have gone farther with that, but I have no evidence that they did not release the version they felt was the right one with that premise in mind. I don’t think they have a specific version in mind and then...

yes, that was a response to the proposals by @GobHag not about 5e

way too overpowered abilities and anime themed. The starting point was and that is beyond what I want at the top level, let alone the starting level. I don’t want my starting character to jump from tree branch to tree branch ‘Crouching Tiger’ style, and then gain abilities from there.

if they can pull that off and keep everything balanced, hat off to them

Shadowdark, and I don’t play that either, but yeah, we still have very different preferences, even if neither of us plays SD

that is fine, they can knock themselves out, doesn’t change that I have zero interest It’s not the attrition, I already said they can switch to something else even in my proposal, it’s that it is superhero wuxia