Search results

  1. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I have a feeling @jasper plays in game stores...poor jasper
  2. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I didn't even know they did one for 3e! Join us Lanefan on this side of 2000, I guarantee you so much fun! ;)
  3. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    To be honest I do not know, but I would guess that would be the major reason. EDIT: In a way it can also function as 4e's version of Bounded Accuracy (monster's remain viable for longer). But there are so many other ways to do this - you could use 3.x's Hardness and Damage Reduction rules...
  4. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    For combat - minions are traditionally used in combat. Minions can stream-line high level combat, I'm not needing to track 30+ minions worth of hit points anymore. In the Storm Kings Thunder AP, the last chapter literally has the party face 30 gargoyles in the Amphitheatre, which dragon's lair...
  5. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I'm struggling to accept this as a credible argument and your initial post down this line. Lets cut dragonborn (I'm not personally a fan) from 5e, does that make 5e a lesser design? I do not think so, probably makes it better in my eyes. Lets cut monks (I'm not personally a fan) from 5e, does...
  6. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    That is interesting that so little was taken from 3e. Do you still use 1e-2e's saving throw systems? attack matrixes? turn undead? So no Feats? Ah right. I wouldn't think that would be a good fit for your game either. What about atunement? Ah yes, that was a great idea for recharging monster...
  7. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    As a preface I will reiterate my table is around 15th level. I do track hit points, when we play - we play in my lounge and I open up an excel on my tv monitor which tracks initiative, conditions, notes and hit points. I do though appreciate the simplicity that minions can bring to an invovled...
  8. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    Out of interest how much of 2e's Handbooks, 3e, 4e's Rituals, or 5e has found its way into your table's game? And how do you incorporate new rules - the table voted, the DMs (as I know it's more than just you) or you alone?
  9. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    Well here is where I agree and disagree with you. For the opening of the door I prefer a consistent DC. It reminds me of the skill tables provided in 3.x with set DCs for checks. For a monster though, given how abstract hit points are, + how the design behind encounters is ever changing...
  10. A

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    Often when doom-scrolling with insta or youtube shorts I come across some interesting info re an animal/insect characteristic etc and I save it with the intention of using in my game and sharing that appreciation of the marvel of our world with my friends and sadly I don't get to it. Yet another...
  11. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    Always felt WotC and perhaps even the DMsGuild have dropped the ball on this!
  12. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    And others of us accept that D&D does simulation well enough. I took a long time with that last sentence. No judgement was intended but rather an explanation as to where that freedom of design originates from.
  13. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I never used the word priority. However my table is currently 15th level, so it is pretty important to me that when there is combat it doesn't devolve into a boring slog-fest. Which means I'm always looking at ways to make it interesting. TBH minions is a concept I had forgotten until this...
  14. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I tend to read @clearstream's comment as one said in jest, not for serious discussion. :ROFLMAO:
  15. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    Sometimes things can be improved upon - I've done that with every edition, 4e is not the exception.
  16. A

    Last week, the Level 14-16 party beat Graz'zt, 2 Marilith and a Storm Giant...easily

    Oh that is a fine idea! I've used proficiency bonus and constitution modifier in the past but I really like yours too.
  17. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    Me to, but since we chose D&D we got the mystery that is hit points. That is why I feel the 5e's Damage Threshold works well with the concept of the 4e minion. I do not believe that was the intention. Crushing their shin with a mallet thus rendering them prone, and practically immobile and...
  18. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I'm of the opinion this came down to the understanding of the game. Those that ran it for me and even when I started running it battled because of our lack of understanding, I feel.
  19. A

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I do not agree, since I consider both obstacles to be overcome by the PCs, not that I'm in favour of doors having their DCs changed depending on the PC's level or the area's level, funnily enough. I prefer more consistency on that issue. I quite like having the freedom to treat monsters as...
  20. A

    Last week, the Level 14-16 party beat Graz'zt, 2 Marilith and a Storm Giant...easily

    Bold emphasis mine. These do not naturally occur. They occur by design. i.e. Design leads to having us play solve it at higher levels.
Top