Search results

Except that every other power that grants two attacks has "per attack" after the damage on the Hit line, and without it I can see it being argued that the second of the "two attacks" is referring to the secondary attack itself (or that the secondary attack applies to each of the "normal" two...

Sorry, I didn't explain myself well enough. I was talking about an ENWorld 4E FAQ. The new mechanics (and sometimes unclear wording) seem to bring up a lot of the same questions, and I thought (in the same way that this thread works) we could pull together a lot of the repeated questions...

If you could point out any of the errors I have listed that aren't part of the final printings, that would be great. I was under the impression that we already mentioned this, but if some slipped by then... oops. I will also add a note to the front post. I not sure I agree. There are a few...

Cheers! Would it be okay if I added all your errata to the first post? (so there could still be a central place for people to locate it)

I have updated the post with the corrections you all have noted. Thank you for your diligent efforts. Also, "errataishness" is now my new favorite word.

That's a good idea, anything added from now on will be dated. I'll try to keep editing down to once a day as well so that the content doesn't change every three seconds (as is has been prone to do given my propensity for trying to make it "perfect"... I can see how errors can slip through if...

Okay, I thank you for showing me the error of my ways. I've added them to the list.

So, what you're saying is that I should just stick to cataloging, not interpreting? The whole "count around solid obstacles that fill their squares" thing didn't make any sense to me. In fact, it still sort of doesn't. Whose squares are "their"s? Bah.

Both powers seem okay to me. Armor Piercing Thrust works as the flavor would imply (no armor bonus for a power that "drive[s] your weapon through a weak point in your foe’s defenses", and its damage is in line with other powers of a similar level (1[W] + STR + DEX (if using a light blade or...

From the 'Origin Square' section of 'Area Attack' (p.271): "For a target to be affected by an area attack, there needs to be line of effect from the origin square to the target." From the 'Burst' section of 'Areas of Effect' (p.272): "A burst affects a target only if there is line of effect...

I would maybe agree with you if they were the exact same power. However, given the fact that both powers' lower level versions are actually better than their higher level incarnations, I have to disagree. It makes much more sense that one of the powers was changed in isolation to make it...

That is hilarious. I've added it to the compendium.

I went with underline to highlight the errors, italics around powers/feats, and 's around headings. I think it looks nice.

Noted. I am also trying to make the post more readable by underlining headings, italicizing powers, and other stuff... does it help? or am I just too particular for my own good?

I have updated the main post with the new errors, as well as adding a "Debated Errors" section where I'll put things that could land on either side of the error/intentional fence.

Could you explain this a bit more so that I can add the correction to the list? My previous corrected values were 3.X thinking with the Strength modifier determining damage... silly me. Thanks, I moved it to the PDF section.

I moved them to their own section. I totally agree that only the errors in the final print books should be noted, but at the moment I have only the PHB with which to double check. My gift set is on order. If you see any other errata listed here that doesn't apply to the actual books, please...

Improved Invisibility doesn't actually say that in the books, it was copied incorrectly. It may be awkward, but it is in the right place. It is a layman's description of the Holy Avenger's Daily power, and it is under the Power heading for reading Magic Item stat blocks. It could go either...

I am currently at work formatting it to look all pretty and stuff.

Done. Edit: Also, on page 191 of the DMG under the Doors heading it says, "Refer to page xx in Chapter 4", it should have referenced page 64.