Search results

So far, the rules don't feel like D&D to me. Or at least they don't seem to be enough of an improvement for me to never play 3.5 again. When 3.0 came out it was a breath of fresh air and I would never play 2.0 again. With 4.0 it doesn't seem to be a replacement for 3.5 but rather a...

I ran it under a 3.0 fan conversion and WOTCs 3.5 conversion. I don't think you will be able to finish it in one 4-5 hr session. You would need to really hurry things along. That being said I think this works very well for a temp 1-3 session game. When I ran the 3.5 conversion I believe it...

bump

I agree completely. I bet 4.5 goes to using G, N, and E. Why did they only 'half' fix alignment? Reminds me of 3.0 where every class lost weapon restrictions except for the Druid.

Dang, I thought they had fixed this. Why not just good, neutral, and evil? Now we can have arguments about what is Good and what is Lawful Good, yipee.

Actually my point is that unlike the GSL (from what we know) has lots of areas that are not covered (unlike the OGL) thus producing uncertainty. There is not clear definition of a 'fan site' so it cannot afford special protection. My biggest complaints are... No interactive software No built...

Didn't read the whole thread. Minions should be thought of as being 'outside' of hit points. 1 hit always kills them, a miss if it does damage will injure them but not kill them.

eh, very much agree that they will not go after a forum. But what about a site that posts all the open content, or whatever its going to be called? What about a site that creates a random NPC generator that is way better than WOTCs, and everyone uses it? What if someone creates something better...

Yes, thats true. But it used to be very easy to lift a feat, spell, class or whatever from another publication. Now its not so easy. Thats my point. Not that it can't be done. Just that the fence is higher now, and people are lazy so they may just not re-use but will re-invent. We will...

bump

True, but I would rather have a gentleman's agreement with WOTC that I can use their stuff w/o fear of getting letter from their lawyers.

Quote: Originally Posted by Brown Jenkin Does this mean that any fan site also has to submit a registration card? Scott also, strongly suggested that the "No Interractive program" clause from the d20 license would remain in the GSL. So, if your site contains any interactive code you could not...

WOTC may be in contact with some of the larger 3PP. However, there are many smaller 3PP that WOTC has not contacted. Me including. All we have is rumors, speculation, and no updates or timetables from WOTC.

I understand the need to "hedge your bets when predicting the date of major announcements". However, you are doing a poor job in communicating with the community. You should be at least be posting once a week saying something like "We are not quite ready to answer your questions, we hope to be...

Yeah, thats my guess as well. But I had hopes that they would answer the questions. Its looking more and more like they will just wait until June 6.

What the heck is going on? Wasn't WOTC gona answer these questions in a day or two? Then we heard from someone saying that everyone was at a show, or in a meeting, or in a different part of the country. But they would answer the questions 'real soon'. Do I have my story straight? So, what is...

Sorry, I missed this. I am looking for a 3.5e or maybe a 4.0 game, would also consider Arcana Evolved game in the Laurel/Columbia area or possible Fredrick. See Sig. Thanks, Scott

Nikroecyst - Sun afternoon doesn't work for me. I am looking for any evening except Mon or Thurs. Corathon - I couldn't bring myself to play 1e again. jezter6 - Just north of which city? Would you be open to 4.0? Do you know anyone else who would be interested? For quicker response email...

Will there be any specific language about how to designate open content? For example one of the points debated heavily on the d20/OGL boards in the past was how a computer program could designate the open content inside its code. The consensus reached was that only the human readable portion...

I disagree. The problem is that lack of clarity from WOTC. How can we possibly have a productive discussion based on hearsay? WOTC needs to step up and just release the license for everyone to take a look at. Then we can all move on to dissecting it and figuring out exactly what it means...