Search results

what happened to his scimitar? Did he get an even stronger one?

Whats with all the odd stats? For someone who is portrayed as a marysue in the novels, they sure did a poor job with his ASIs. Honestly, if I ever run a FR adventure for some reason, npcs like drizzle and eleminster wont even exist.

I think a far realm subclass might be worth a look down the line.

Ok first off this is a mess. I understand this is playtest material, but there are some things that make me slap my forehead. So wizards is breaking their concentration rules and in a poorly designed trap. Why are you shoving a warlord build into the psion? Just give us a :):):):)ing warlord...

I think it would be really easy to do. Im not talking about when they record them live, Im talking about when they put them up on GnS. They actually have split their vids a few times. The problem right now is that i fall asleep so i dont know where i left off, then it takes forever to find the spot.

I would love it if they cut their vids into hourish sized chunks.

Just remember one of the golden rules for dnd"Dont be a dick dm". Let your player have fun with his spell.

Ah, you will hurt drizzles feelings.:(

The fact is there are a few stupid class names in dnd. The fighter should be called the warrior. The barbarian should be called the berserker. The monk should be called racist steriotype.:cool: You get my drift.

I think calling them solos was a mistake on wizards part.

I think a big mistake many make is dumping action economy for others into the core class. I think the warlords core should be where his healing is focused on. Then you add two subclasses. One focused on action economy for allies, this one will use INT. The second one will focus on buffs/tempHP...

Was this vision real or was I dreaming?

Is all they are testing classes and subclasses? They still havent locked down a good warforged. Along with the mystic, maybe some psionic subclasses for the fighter, monk, and rogue.

They pushed 3.5 and 4th on us way to quick for both editions good. I think with the much smaller design group and slower book release schedule, 5th has a few extra years added to its run. Im hoping that anyway. As a fan of 4th, I felt they rushed everthing after the first year and a half or so...

Look dnd is a game, so there will always be atleast a little metagaming. I have seen a few players focus too much on their stats in my many years of gaming and it can get annoying.

When it comes to straight combat, 5th is mostly balanced. There are a few classes that are at the top of exploration/skill challenges, but its not as bad as some editions. Class doesnt really matter for roleplaying in my opinion. So I dont really see the problem. Not as balanced as 4th, but more...

Lore means nothing for classes. Make up what you need.

Warcaster plus buff spells and con prof. saves.

As everyone says, shield is a must. Booming blade if your tanking. If you go dex build, a bow will out dpr cantrips. I would spend all my free spells on utility spells. Fireball is a great way to start a fight when you get 3rd lvl spells, but its got alot of competition. EKs really become the...

he can only attack twice for the first round, because he needs a empty hand to reload.