Search results

Yeah, I see the argument for 'more numerous'.

@dave2008 I'm sure your proofreaders have spotted it, but sight not site. Also, I think here I'd say 'most numerous', not 'more numerous'. More numerous than what?

I get that. You're one of the good posters on this board. I wasn't trying to disparage you. I'm not sure what this person is promoting. I think they might have a problem communicating their message, such as it is. I was initially put off by their initial posts, as were you, but I'm willing to...

Don't do that. If you have a problem with an argument, debate that problem. Personal attacks, dehumanising others, not cool.

Don't get me wrong! I loved the first game. The combat aspect was top shelf. That storyline... and the dialog. Ouch. I'm still buying Solasta 2, though... that's how much I loved the gameplay!

A club of seals.

I really hope a second iteration of this game includes a storyline approaching average, if not professional quality. The approach to 5E combat was amazing. The rest of the game was... wow.

When someone responds to you with a reasoned post, how about not talking to them like they are an idiot? Measured tones, sir.

The civility and consideration of others and their opinions in this thread is refreshing.

That's a great approach too, but I think both are enjoyable in their own flavour of campaign.

I've played through twice. My first character was a Beast Master Ranger (which I enjoyed a lot more than the Paladin I took the second go round). I wonder how differently the Swarmkeeper plays?

Hey folks! Enjoy the thread! I made the point I was trying to make. Made some new friends, had a few folks Ignore me (what an awful feature), but that is their prerogative. I took some hits, I think opened some eyes, and hopefully left the place tidier than when I got here. Much as you would an...

It's not about owing anyone discourse. It's about not putting up walls in society. And about not branding people you disagree with as F*Wits. That's a good place to start!

To me, someone being obviously aggressive and abusive is a different animal than 'that person annoys me'. At that point, I would contact the site's moderation to see about banning that person. There is normal human friction, then there is that. Although I would still honestly have it out with...

??? I did know that. Did I say something to imply otherwise?

I say a lot of funny things that even I have forgotten. Good! You're a poster who I have a lot of respect for and I would be disappointed if that wasn't reciprocated.

Well, yes, more than slightly. Why would you pretend to be something you're not? Assuming that is the baseline is nihilistic.

yes, usually you do @mamba This was worth quoting me for? Dude... you're better than this. No, most of the time, people do not recognise they are speaking to an actual person. They speak to them like they are trash when they disagree with them. See how I am being direct with you and not...

Honestly, folks... embrace this in your IRL lives. Don't get worked up or offeneded or get quiet when someone says something you don't like, or offends you, or whatever. Own the situation. Not in the sense of you become 'the winner', as that is the human nature response. Just say: well, that...