Search results

Nah, wizard subclasses are boring because wizard is an inherently boring concept.

Microlite had three, Strength, Dexterity and Mind, then added Charisma somewhere else.

It really depends, not all tropes are the same. Some are more inspiring and some are more trite and played off or just less interesting. I sometimes like to play against type, sometimes I just look for the class that helps me the best to play a trope, and some times I just want to play the...

Fighter (Str) Rogue (Dex) Barbarian (Con) Psion (int) Monk( wis) Sorcerer (Cha)

The PHB is still around though. This subclass can't tell any of the stories and backgrounds of the sorcerer. No "grandma was a dragon", no "I'm just magic", no "please how can I stop this and be normal". And I don't see how you shifting the themes from the known subclasses onto other clases...

That's not a sorcerer. That's a wizard wielding sorcerer's toys.

My biggest objection is that Sorcerer is the original Charisma caster. It would take something away from the concept. Better to move all of the others away from Cha casting.

Midway through the first episode of the batch. I find it interesting that the clones (edit: and non-humans) manage to be more humane than the "actual humans."

My preference will aleays be ore crunchy races. Mechanical possitive support and negative support. Some race/class combos should be harder to pull off. Having said that, given the current trends, I'd rather have race/whatever as purely cosmetic and lore based. Just like with backgrounds, you...

I've silenced that channel. I won't lie, it felt cozy during the OGL fiasco, but it is just too much drama for drama's sake.

I'm following theNetflix release

Aww, what a sudden unhappy ending. Well, let's wait a few months for more episodes to drop.

Again, they were going to take metamagic away from Wizards (and everybody else) anyway. They had removed it half-way through the playtest with little fanfaire. And at that point it was a lame "once per day metamagic". (And now that I think of it, the feat from Tasha's that anybody can take is...

That kit just changes "I went to magical college" with "I learned at home with spooky youtube and magic suggar daddy still sends care packages from time to time" The witch kit still lugs a spellbook and needs it. And all witches are still geniuses( going for the higher int requirement).

I wish warlocks could risk loing access to their power if they wrong their patron. But that won't happen with paladins not being able to fall, or clerics being able to be cut down from their deity.

The designers have definitely muddied the waters. Instead of leaning onto the sorcerer being all innate and the warlock being all external, they went with "your sorcerer can be also 'created' by an external force", and "your patron changes you." For a hombrew basic I'm picking warlock and...

Yeah, I didn't.

@Minigiant I think it would be more productive to split the sorcerer rather than merge it into other class. I can see some dicothomies that muddy the design. The desire for metamagic versus the desire for a dead simple beginner friendly caster. Monster magic versus personal magic. Flashy...

Well, if what you think is that sorcerer needs better mecanics, maybe that is what you should argue for instead of calling for its removal or merger into other class (which is a removal, each class has its own fiction, lose the class, lose the fiction)

After their first time in the playtest, the next we learned of them was in a Legends and Lore post after the Mage was shot down by the community. And the next time we saw the actual sorcerer was when the draft PHB leaked, but at that point there was nothing left to do or say that could alter the...