Search results

Looking great 👍

I actually am wishing someone would do the opposite of shrinking the equipment. My favorite part of the 2014 sheets were that the spell sheet and the sheet with additional boxes for equipment, traits, magic items, character traits/bonds/etc were on completely different sheets. As someone who...

If you aren't aware of just how much homophobia is rooted in closeted repressed homosexuals self hating their own, you probably should spend time talking to more lgbtq+ people. And if you can't see how sweaty and oily shirtless men in loin cloths wrestling one another is hilariously queer...

I wouldn't. Not only was I not alive for the vast majority of the 80s, I think the 80s esthetic largely does NOT vibe or mix well with the type of stories that would fit DnD. Mainly because I have VERY strong opinions that electric instruments/heavy metal do NOT belong in the fantasy genre. It's...

They don't do it for the same reason they won't give ranger's concentration free Hunter's mark: at first level an extra free 1d6 is a hell of a splash temptation for people wanting to stack it with other l effects like Hex and divine favor. They don't want someone to be able to all of them at...

My fix will be this: 1st level; Leave as is. It's a perfectly fine feature at this level and frankly at this point Hunter's Mark needs concentration in order to prevent multi-classing shenanigans. Either 5th, 7th, or 9th level: They get a new feature that allows them to cast Hunter's Mark...

Can you confirm if nonspellcasters can still cast spells as rituals if they take the Ritualcaster feat? Nothing in the feat text specifies it so it'll likely be listed in spellcasting's general rules section.

Personally, I'm waiting until I see the final text in order to decide which homebrew rules I'll be implementing. Based on what I'm aware of now? I'll likely shift some of the hunter's mark related features around. I personally like the idea of rangers getting concentration removed from hunter's...

Where to even begin with this? I just want one thing: The complete severence of the D&D brand from Wizards of the Coast (more accurately Hazbro), or ANY other corporate entity. But presume you wish to keep the scope of the conversation to strictly in-game mechanics, so... 1) The complete...

Honestly that would be a quick fix too. Just a) make the arcane shots work with all ranged weapons, b) give them prof mod per short rest, and make the higher level feature recover a shot each time you roll initiative and boom. Class fixed. Some shots might need minor adjustmentz and I'd love a...

The problem with this approach is: a) It shoehorn in an entirely different subclasses's core mechanic in into b) what is basically a ribbon feature. It would also be too much at level 3 if my other proposed 3rd level feature was implemented and getting it at 7th level would both push back...

For my table, I use the following version of the Banneret/PDK: Rallying Cry: At 3rd level, as a bonus action, you can choose a number of creatures within 60 feet of you up to your Charisma modifier (minimum 1). Each one regains hit points equal to your 1d10 + your Charisma modifier, provided...

Getting 5x your proficiency modifier to damage in a single turn thanks to great weapon master (I'm talking about the new version) is not "fixed", and that is before taking into account the plethora of magic items, spells, or other features that grant extra damage dice on every Attack. Nor does...

It's not a bad idea in theory. But in practice I see two issues: 1) Sharpshooter/Great Weapon Master. These two feats make these features incredibly broken when they are already some of the best feats in the game. Sharpshooter especially as it is easily the worse of the two and Rangers are well...

The problem with this approach is twofold: 1) It is heavily based on eastern martial arts themes, or more accurately a western misinterpretation of them, which is exactly the sort of thing WoTC is trying to avoid by renaming Ki into Discipline points. 2) Even if we are fine with the monk...

Personally, after taking a look through the different bastions, most of them could outright do away with the level restrictions. There are a few of them currently labeled 13th level+ that I think could be justified as being reserved for 10th level characters and up (the pub is not one of them)...

Honestly that's valid point. Thinking about it that light I actually would be okay with combining the wizard and sorcerer into one class. Making "I'm the books guy" a subclass, maybe metamagic another, the blood lines one, etc. Heck I'd even be fine with making them all Int based. It would...

Gee. It's almost as though the warlock and sorcerer both being charisma spell-casting classes that both gain their powers through otherworldly sources interfering with their life is too similar a concept and they should arguably have been one class in the first place with the player selecting if...

I'll doublecheck. I hope that's the case. If so I retract my concerns about the lack of ritual casting. Now here's hoping it actually makes it to print if so. Pretty much. insert starship troopers theme here I'll be doing my part! Now now. We can't have that type of heresy speak around...

Sadly I can understand a corporation's desire to cater to the bottom line by attempting to coddle and Pavlovian train an entire new generation of players spoiled by instant gratification and subliminally convince them that D&D is more like a video game the sake of lulling them into a state of...