Search results

I guess I am weird... I have no problem renting use on a cloud space as long as the monthly payment is low. heck, that is why I use rent a center and pawn shops and credit cards and lay a way. I would pay up to $10 a month (hopefully with a discount if you buy the year) for access

Ok, so it sounds weird, and a lot of subclasses don't work off the basic class. However I have some examples I would like some feed back on. If I played a rogue, and instead of taking a rogue sub class took the fighter one with maneuvers. (Battle master maybe?) Could it work if I just took the...

you don't see a problem with the fact that you singled out the DM as end all be all ? you don't see where it create conflict at all? and has in every edition, but the basic social contract is still the same... "don't be a jerk" should be the real rule 0 wait... what?!?!?! but the DM does...

what about when what you want to disallow isn't weird or out there?!?!? lets try this hypothetical DM designs a basic 3.5 D&D world... says "Hey lets play, here is the world" Player A says... "Cool, I want to play a half drow Warlock... my mom was a bar maid and my father a raider, I don't...

even that isn't a gurantee... two of the best examples are Psionics and Book of 9 Swords... Psionics were self contained in 2 of the 3 editions I played. (2e and 3e) But it was seen as power creep. Book of 9 swords is the master though... if you didn't like 3e melee non casters you might love...

a better example is smoking... because when you do it in a group everyone has the choice of leave the group or put up with the smoke... lets use some examples from my gaming history... 2e: I have the complete book of elves and want to play a bladesinger. I roll up my 2/2 fighter/wizard elf and...

I loved the piercer... I've never seen one like that... I also love almost every monster, but they all took a level of badass...

once when I was drunk I was counting on my fingers and only got to 9... but I sobered up and found the finger I lost... I still have ten

I wish I had taken your advise when you gave it... somepeople just like to call others cheaters even when they play by the rules

my only question is how you framed this (informal) research... because again there is a line between dragon born being feminian and dragonborn being porn...

please link to when I did that ?!?!? 1e is not really in my wheel house, the only 1e I ever played was heavy house rule and I never ran it... of cource you know I did ask quastions and was confused... but never called you a liar.. I even went so far as to say MY players hand book knowing it...

interesting... I wonder if you could make the class I really want out of this.. the battle master fighter sub class on a mostly rogue frame, but with some paliden (of vengeance) add on. the ability to be a skill monkey sneak attacking weapon master... oh hell I want to be a female Ezio...

as I said in my first post, there are a lot of ways to make me connect with a female race... the easiest and quickest is by making them female looking, not just breasts, but yes partially. as for full/real woman without them I will again relate the problems my mother has to this day because she...

great... and again I don't understand your definition of loop hole... . how is using the candle to summon something (witch is what it is ment for) then using the summoned creature for it's spell like ability a loop hole? it may be badly balanced and badly written, but if that's a loop hole...

1st, thank you, and second I think your post nailed most of the argument in a fair and balanced way... if every picture looked like the 2e hanging out porn, I would be against it... but when the art of 5e makes women look like women AND Bad ass instead of falling out, I believe wotc is doing...

ok, how are you rateing spell casting. how are you handleing subclasses?

that is where your analogy breaks down... char op isn't a cheat nore is it insider trafing... it's reading a text book on it and making the trades and doing it well... or like I said neither are loopholes... one is stupid though... please walk me through this with the candle... how are you not...

I can atleast see how you can say that about the bag of rats (and again I have never seen a DM who would allow it) but can you explain how using the candle is exploiting anything? you are using it to summon a creature and make a deal... that is kinda the idea of the candle...

ok, but it will cost them 0$ if they continue to publish ones with boobs... so what makes either more right then the other? Way back when I started in 2e I was trying to find myself... if the part about sex and gender where in that book, and the art was more like 4e or 5e, maybe it would have...

last I heard this is what mike mearls was working on... have the rp prereq and a level requirement... as long as old man in the mountain training levels can't be taken till 6th, we can give tghem the power level of a 6th or 7th level class... AND then it hurts no one if you ignore the prereq