Search results

I wish I could go in on this one, I missed the last one, but if I go in for this now I either don't pay rent, or go walk the streets to pay both...:(

Hi, I'm a woman who likes RPGs, and fantasy and Sci fi movies and books. I currently work part time as a bartender and part time as a security guard. I find that none of the dateing sites are real, they are full of dumb ads telling how many other women there are, but the day I sign up 500 men...

maybe... but whats the matter with thinking the character is hott...

Second episode was good, I will just say if any villains need a young woman to throw themselves at coleson to distract him, sign me up... :lol: I do like that sky is still a bit of a wildcard. What did everyone else think?

really? that is what you take away from me asking to be a mythic hero... I guess in 3.x/pathfinder being a useful and exciting character is a casters mojo

WHat about when I want to play a swordman and hate the limits put on them? how about (like D&D next that I love so far) we have fighters that can choose what way they are built, and as such I can play my complex fighter and you can play your simple one? Why should I be stuck with "Well that...

in 2e fighters have the highest hit points, the best AC and the best damage... I used to joke that wizards were nice enough to ask you to save vs death magic, meanwhile fighters just death you. a weapon spec fighter could hit an AC 0 on a 16 and deal 1d8+5 damage and attack 3 times in 2 rounds...

the problem isn't competing with Bob or Wendy, it is competing with me playing a wizard, or warblade. See I can play only so many games, so when I play I want to play a character that is challenging to play, and also fun. I want to have to figure out lots of synergies, and I want to make major...

the problem I and others like me have is that it is possible for spells nice things to do things combat feat nice things can't come close to, but there nothing (or atleast damn near close to nothing) that a feat nice thing can do that a spell nice thing can't do atleast as well. heck a...

The fact that you deal a die of weapon damage per level means that you outstrip the impposrtants of 'smite' attacks quickly... heck at level 6 you deal 6d8+str mod x2... that is insane.

no, that is how I JUDGE CLASSES, I never suggested you do that or even should. I was just showing my thoughts... actually my point was there were concepts of warriors that the fighter can not represent, and the 3 class es in that book made them possible. It is a new class I am compairing it to...

it is an online comic that has a huge following by a professional in the roleplaying world, and it is both funny and well thought out. Well it wouldn't be dead set proof of a statement the fact that you disregard it so easily tells me something about you. ok so lets just focus on what you think...

I only think it is radical because you are cutting 9/10 of the book out of your comparison. Just to be fair my normal way to look at if something is broken, is to forget druids exsist at all, then take a mod optimized cleric (no persetant spells, not fully everything perfect) and that is the...

I disagree, there is no baseline because the core book is all over the place, they tried to fix that at the end of the edtion by normalizing things (around 6-7) instead. ok fine... everyone who rates teirs of classes is wrong... silly them. Every person who did the math was flawed... sorry. I...

I will still argue it isn't the same. I have played in games like that, and the NPCs are getting a hell of a free ride. (infact there is a OotS comic making fun of it) PCs and NPCs are different (FULL STOP). You do make NPCs that level, it still only is part of a story that the PCs have a MUCH...

the knight doesn't have any mind control, they have a tuant, one that is explained in fluff... what are you talking about... I played one for 14 levels... wow just wow... it is more powerful then the weakest core class, but weaker then the strongest 3 core classes... so perfectly in the...

you have like 50 classes, there is a fighter, a knight, a swashbuckler, 2 different samari classes that all fit in your little box... Paladin and maybe a few others like it are someone in-between what you want and what I want. warblade or crusader is what I am looking for. Why do I get told...

I on the other hand feel the opposite, they hit there stride after Arcane Power, and really got good with PHB2... before that there where 3 different games packaged as one, then those books brought about a finally the ability for martial characters to be in the same league as spell casters (ok...

I may not have been born when you took that day off from work... was that before or after April 1987???

I agree 100%, the problem becomes when a player wants to be a knight, or a soldier, or an archer... and still have those f-Z abilities... 4e, and Bo9s and a bunch of others have started to let that happen... see that is me, I show up and want to play a cool character, but in 1 edition (well...