Search results

I think Entangle could be lvl 1, since it's like Sleep but less powerful. The targert is immobilized rather than unconscious, and it has no miss effect. Call Lightning looks like Prismatic Burst: But it's a daily, has miss effect and deals less damage. Maybe level 5-7.

Call Lightning Calls down lightning bolts on your enemies Daily[ ] Nature, Implement Standard Action Area burst 2 within 20 squares Target: Each creature in burst Attack: Wisdom vs. Reflex Hit: 2d8 + Wis modifier lightning damage, and target is stunned until the end of your next turn...

Speak with Animals Druid Orison You can comprehend and communicate with animals. At-will [ ] Nature Minor Action Ranged 5 Effect: You are able to ask questions of and receive answers from natural beasts, although the spell doesn’t make them any more friendly or cooperative than normal...

Entangle Grasses, weeds, bushes, and even trees wrap, twist, and entwine about creatures, holding them fast wherever they go and causing them to become entangled. Encounter [ ] Nature, Implement Standard Action Area burst 2 within 20 squares Target: Each creature in burst Attack: Wisdom...

Minis, grid and now a beard? What else will we need?

What If I'm wielding the +3 Flaming Sword in one hand, and the +2 Storm Pick of Disarming n the other? I'm sorry for all the few-rolls-the-better design philosophy, but 2WF must allow two attacks. I'm ok with the following rule: If you wield two weapons, you still can attack only once in your...

I agree, but there would be a problem. Anyone can wield a weapon in each hand and attack with them, so we need rules for that.

Very good. Thanks!

I've heard they are entering the book shredding business too.

This, my friends, I call wisdom.

There are no roles in WoW, only class builds that are fan made conventions. The 'roles' are not part of the system. In D&D the classes are built and design around the roles. Marks in D&D are defensive abilities. Nothing to do with WoW marks besides the term. Raid marking is even a metagame...

All I know is that it awakened my dormant anti-WW sentiment.

It reminded me of the Simulationist's Manifesto: "We don't need special metagame rules to make our characters heroes, cheats are for cheaters. Just give me the same tools that everyone else gets, let me perfect them using my own effort and I'll show what heroism is all about. We don't need...

That's not serious. Unfortunately, $E is.

I think it's more common in our country where most groups are actually a bunch of long time friends that do a lot of things together, RPG being one of them, instead of a group of people that have only D&D in common.

I've seen some people saying Paizo's decision to make a 3.5 of the 3.5 to be blessing... So Wotc going 3.5 is an outrage, but Paizo, a 3rd party publisher, going 3.75 on everyone is a blessing?? What if wotc instead of going 4E went 3.75? Would it be a super blessing or a even worse outrage...

Here, try again. 1- Running speed is too slow. People should move faster than that when running. It makes no sense. 2- A dwarf running gains a 40% increase to his speed. An elf running gains a 28% increase to his speed. It makes no sense. IT MAKES NO SENSE. Do you want me to define "it makes...

Because I enjoy a little of consistence. I don't like the fact that an elf that was supposed to be a quick character can't run half as fast as myself. It has nothing to do with some classes or magic items. I'm used to people moving in different speeds, speeds that make sense. Why everytime you...

Two problems: 1- Running speed is too slow. Unless it works different out of combat, it makes no sense. 2- A dwarf running gains a 40% increase to his speed. An elf running gains a 28% increase to his speed.

If I was a 3.5 supporter I would ask: PLEASE PAIZO, KEEP IT 3.5!!! IF I WANTED A REPLACEMENT FOR 3.5 RULES I'D GO 4E. They are not only betraying 4E but 3.5 too!!