Search results

Yes, but it's a construct whoes very name puts it into an undead adventure. It helps spice up the encounter by not being an undead yet has has every right to be in the middle of an undead-fest.

Add my vote to Nimblewright and Cadaver Collector. I'm a player and I hate fighting the Nimblewrights - at least when I'm fighting them. Ask me outside of the encounter and I'm likely to say it was a really cool fight with a really cool monster - but not during the fight. I think every time...

To my knowledge my group is 100% Windows (at home at least) and that includes 2 I.T. professionals.

(I had the 6-hour one as an "anti-camp for 8 hours and rememorize" situation.)

This is assuming that there isn't one of those aforementioned time constraints (either the "you have 10 minutes" variety or of the "you have six hours" variety). This may or may not be the case. If you have no time limit then there likely isn't anything stopping you from regaining your spells...

It might also be dispelled.

Katanas are sooooo last edition. I hear they use kukris now.

Contrived? Maybe. But what's stopping the DM from saying the group has X amount of time from the moment they first enter the dungeon (say... 5 or 10 minutes. That'll cut down on the 1 Minute recovery uses) or from the time they first hear of the adventure ("Yeah, the temple is only ten...

I just hope they dropped the forced 'Dark and Sinister' vibe from the class. If a player wants to play and angst-ridden Warlock that is the social outcast fighting his demonic heritage - I have no problem with that. But why can't I play a Lawful Good "Warlock" that uses his blasting power to...

Don't give in to the Delete movement. It's just proof that they are moving to Alt-Ctrl-Delete which is just so video gamey.

I heavily prefer Frozen. It can advance during an edition change but that's it. No adding in cannon in the middle of an edition.

I think it's both. it's a strength because you can go into the store, pick up a book and be fairly sure you can use anything in it tonight without having to have any previous books. It's a weakness because if you pick up a book that has a Warlock base class (or the Bo9S or the 3e Tome of Magic)...

Our group pulled a lot of stuff from Eberron into our FR campaign we had going. Since that campaign is now over our roup voted tohave the next campaign in Eberron proper.

I'm all for having the Changeling as a PC race. I think there are enough occurances of shapeshifters in fanatasy that they should be added as a generic and setting-neutral option. But not in the PHB (or at least not in the first PHB). I think there are enough "even more generic" racial...

Apparently, I'm wrong then.

My question right now is why the tiefling is a playable race in the PHB but not the aasimar?

I could definately go for that. And I voted for the Complete Divine style of turning. It is much simpler and fits with the style of the rest of the game; as opposed to the multiple step prossess that the PHB style is that doesn't really fit with anything else in the system that I can think of...

I agree with the reason but I would still leave the Green Magic talent tree open to rangers. I see it a similar to how I want to see Unarmed Martial Arts fighting abilities seperated from Zen Inner Soul abilities. This combination works fine for Buddist Monk style builds but sometimes I want...

Farewell, Good Sir.

Woo Hoo!!! "Could have fooled me; that last battle took long enough." Hee.