Search results

No. It's in line with other combos.

I think genre has something to offer, and I am glad it exists. Sometimes I want LOTR style high fantasy, sometimes I want to be able to jump 20 feet in the air, and swing a 9 foot sword. I'm also in my mid 30's, so if I can enjoy many things, and tolerate more, I dont understand all the hate...

Whats he gaining as a lycanthrope, under this? Scent that isnt scent, and what else? Are other Lycanthropes going to be similarly gimped, or he just the wimpiest lycanthrope in the known world?

My Paladin of Tyranny frequently fought good people?

Swordsage is certainly not more powerful than anything. Crusader is arguable, but if its an argument, then it isnt exceptionally more powerful, and Warblade is better than fighter, but not that much better than Barbarian. The classes in ToM are nice, and flavorful, but for the most part, they...

Its much more humane than traps designed to kill, and further, Book of Exalted Deeds has a spell that tortures evil people by forcing them into goodness.

All base classes, just like Swordsage, Crusader, and Warblade

What a great idea this disease is. If I were an LG God, I'd set up the opposite disease in my domain, so that any evil encroachment, ends up with all the evil people being converts.

Paladin of Tyranny 4/Hexblade 2/Blackguard is what I did, Tyranny aura causes save penalty, hexblade curse causes save penalty, nice synergy, and I went with high stat Cha/Str/Con/Wis/Dex/Int, crazy saves, mettle, divine might, divine shield, etc. I enjoyed it as a very defensive fighter with...

The table clarifies that its a melee attack used as part of a standard action, not a melee attack standing on its own.

I think the issue here is, the table is clarifying the text, its explaining exactly what the text meant. If you read the text that way, the table and text agree. If you make up your mind before you read the table, then you tend to claim the table is in error. If the table WAS in fact, in error...

No, I'll be inside.

In the feat text for Improved Unarmed Strike, and in the Monk class description, I'm guessing. AKA, the corner case exceptions.

Here is the original post: Thats with no bonuses, no flanking, no magical items, no buffs. I'm pretty confident you can hit with multiples of those, hitting with 3 is better than the Scout's total. Hitting with 4 or 5 is twice as good. Get lucky, and triple the benefit. I think if we're...

Awesome! I can now cast spells as an AoO! Great rules work.

The funniest part is, I dont need you to agree with me. Dammit, _______. Not everyone believes what you believe. _______: My beliefs do not require them to. Bonus points for the quote. My game doesnt change based on what you, or anyone else on this thread believes, nor do I find it...

But he HAS proved his claim, at least 40 times so far. You on the other hand, have not only not proved your claim, you've driven people over to Hypersmurf's side. But keep going, I'm still chuckling from this morning, and your post count is going up.

Poor monk hits for 1d20 and flurries with his unarmed strikes. He gets no sympathy from me. A battle dancer, or a fighter(brawler) or a swordsage(unarmed) who gets to choose INA doesnt bother me in the slightest. Since they chose a terrible dmg, terrible crit weapon that they needed to blow a...

It does not. So, aside from the monk's class ability to do extra damage with unarmed strikes, my response is "Yes."

Wait, does Improved Unarmed Strike say "You can only attack with your fist"? Let me go look that up...