Search results

As a Dragonlance fan, I would actually be disappointed in this. I like the story and the first module, but find after that it gets too railroady, and I don't like that the adventure party splits into two storylines. However, I would love to see a setting sourcebook.

I feel certain that it will be a settings book. I feel almost certain it will be Dragonlance, but it could be a Forgotten Realm expansion, or Planescape, or Dark Sun. Or maybe another M:tG crossover.

The top says the AP is called "Live Free or Die." Its proper title is "Fly Free or Die."

Okay, I have decided that Dragonlance is going to be the next released setting with novel releases, and I refuse to believe otherwise. I mean this tongue-in-cheek, but it does make me excited that Dragonlance still might have some life in it!

My predictions: Settings: We'll get two of them, Planescape and Ravenloft. Hardcover: Famous Dragon's Book of Stuff (focused on all things draconic) Adventure: A Far Realms-inspired adventure in the Forgotten Realms

Who knows, though. Maybe 5e is next. My guess is that none of the staff wishes to work on converting APs to other systems so they will depend on 3rd parties. It may be just a matter of time before a 3rd party is willing to convert these APs to 5e and Paizo will give them a license to do so.

I feel split on this. In my own games, I like having a diversity of races to roleplay with, without the straight jacket of racial alignment. That’s one reason I like Eberron. I also understand the parallels of racial descriptions (like “savage”) in both fantasy and real life and how such...

My curiosity is piqued as I love the APs but dislike Pathfinder. Who has played Savage Worlds? What’s it like?

I like the idea of having a subsystem that ties PCs to the setting and inspires players to treat their characters as characters rather than just a series of stats. But it feels that the system in place is a little weak. I may play around with asking players to describe the background or reason...

I am curious about how or if groups use the personality traits, ideals, bonds, and flaws system in their game. I have some thoughts about them, but I wanted to hear from others before I share mine.

I saw that. I was really hoping to play around with the new customization options. Hopefully it will be up soon.

I love the book! I like how you can customize your character more and how it guides you to create your own races, your own particular style of any particular race, sidekicks, and Beast Master Companions. The stuff on race abilities has been needed for a long time. I like the flavor of the new...

Wow. A lot of speculation here. The End of Wizards! The fall of D&D! So far they're planning to put out a card game and an RPG about magical-wielding gangsters. I enjoy speculation as much as the next guy, but this feels like a stretch. Maybe I'm wrong and someday Mercer will be President...

Ordered the game. I also want to try Tiny Towns and Point Salad. Cool award!

Kender as a drawback? I think not, sir! Dragonlance has many flaws. Chiefly among them being that the setting is so closely tied to the novels that it would be difficult to feel like you aren't side characters of a bigger story. The setting is also a bit...how do I put this...

Nope. WotC owns Dragonlance. Sovereign Press had a license with WotC to publish Dragonlance during the 3e period.

I don't agree that Dark Sun would require more than one book, and the idea that WotC doesn't own Dragonlance is factually wrong. And honestly, I don't care how "generic fantasy" a setting might be. If there's demand, then WotC will produce it.

I don't think the movie hurt the product line. People quickly forgot about it. It was more an opportunity squandered, just like the Airbender film was just...unfortunate. But we still got The Legend of Korra, and Avatar: The Last Airbender is more popular than ever. I bought a lot of the 3e...

I would say Dark Sun and Planescape will definitely happen. Past that, I'd say it's between Dragonlance or Greyhawk.

I don't necessarily need a "crunchier" game in terms of game mechanics. One thing I like about 5e is that I rarely have to look up advanced rules for things like grappling or whatever. However, I would like to see more meaningful character choices as characters level. In 5e, once characters...