Search results

Depends. If they became tone deaf, and didnt listen or were as accessable as they are now to their CUSTOMERS, then yes they would start having a bunch of disgrunted folks. If they were even more successful, but maintained the same(or better) level of customer service, public relations, and...

False deliema. GW isnt hated because its sucessful. Its hated becuase it intentionally does items to piss off its customer base. And refuse to listen to them. Pazio will follow most of say privteer press, who does keep a sharper ear to its customer base, and responds to them. The are very...

If one is flipping through to see the content, its not a problem. One needsto see if its worth the cover price by scanning whats in the issue. If he's READING it in the book store and then putting it back, I think its warranted.

Right, its all hypothical. But if hypothically asking me to spend real money, It would have to be real support. Just thrown a bone and an article wouldnt do it. I'm not spending between 10-15 dollars for the occassional article.

That depends on what and how much they do. If it stays all 4e and just throws a odd article to older edition or odd adventure, then no. Just throwing a bone or one article a week/month to whatever edition I supprt wouldnt get me to subscribe. It have to be full on support. Otherwise no.

"We're curently working on a suprising number of 4e products at the moment. Like the upcoming Dark Sun campaign and a few others we have in mind." Deflection of the question wouldnt be a confirmation nor a rejection. But thats justme.

Right. They began design work. They didnt TALK ABOUT IT until years later.

why are thewy even discussing 5th edition? Its what, year 2 of 4e? Its silly to even discuss it as a designer.

Not wading through the thread, but lone wolf posted an update on dakka and their site(the paragraph is from dakka): I have a quick update for those of you interested in the situation that unfolded earlier this week between Lone Wolf Development and Privateer Press. In short, it turns out I...

Its not my opinion at all. Your logic is flawed. Try this one more time: The only people to blame for the cancellation of the magazine are the ones that called the license back. Who called the license back and cancelled the contract. WotC. Paizo didnt get teh choice in the matter. Wotc is...

So anyone who doesnt follow WOtc is a bad customer? You pretty much confirmed what I said earlier. You pretty much represent that portion of business that really doesnt understand customers or what they really want. That entire paragraph is revisionism. None of those things were related to...

Speculation and posible revisionism. There's no evidence that WOtc Intentionally acted as the bad guys. They were, in fact, the "bad guys". Wotc MADE the decision to cancel the magazines. They were pulling in all licenses. So they, or course, deserve the balme for the matter. They werent...

And they flung their share. And made several mistakes. You sound silly with the "we're hard to please"? Really? I'd argue that WotC had a direction they were going, and it was damned the torpedos. Why? I'd argue that whether you like paizo or not, whether you use it or not.....Paizo made...

What YOU believe is irrelevant. Judging by, for example, the cancellation of the magazines and teh fans outrage, and WOTC's lack of having something ready(read, the only thing they really said was they had something REALLY REALLY cool coming), yes it was. The fact they had to trot folks out...

Your opinion whether it was necessary or not. But the undeniable fact is...WotC went about it in a I dont want to say Hostile manner, but definately an antagonistic manner with some of its fan base. When Microsoft, walmart, Hyundai, Sears acts in a manner towards its customer base, its not not...

No offense, but if you dont want new powers, classes or the like, but want settings, there are already a ton of them out there from 3.x and now a pathfinder setting. There really is no need to do a 4e specific one, if folks dont want the associated classes, powers and items like in 3.x...

Judging by the orignial posters post, his party doesnt seem to even do that set of basic tactics.

Maybe you should start playing them to their fullest and get them to see how working together works. Its a player disconnect. I'm not saying have a TPK, but if someone dies, becuase they dont work together, well maybe they will start pulling together. Your party is getting towards, if not...

By that logic our bard is an ineffective character. We spend alot of time digging his character ou tof roleplaying trouble. IN combat he adds quite a bit. Roleplaying wise he's a headache and a handful.

Whats alot less? The rogue in question who couldnt play well with others, the actual character was pretty ineffectual from what we saw, but if he just worked with us and the party, it could have not been a problem. I'd rather have someone thats ineffective that can work with a party, than an...