Search results

Ah yes I WAS remembering right. I was pretty sure 2e's DMG offered the gnome paladin as the reason why AD&D's racial restrictions were so important, but I didn't feel like dragging it off my shelf to check. It wasn't gnome paladins they needed to be worried about, it was DROW RANGERS, but UA...

Unfortunately for Snarf, that leaves out this sword (though it's not that terribly powerful): I think those inch radii are probably referring to 1e movement rates because otherwise it would be a ridiculously small area for the effects.

Something tells me that @Snarf Zagyg wants to bite bards with the teeth of Dahlver-Nar. Unless he's afraid he won't be able to get the taste out of his mouth.

No mention of the deck of many things? And the dwarf thrower hammer from Dragon #156 (April 1990):

Even though I mentioned it, I'm not obsessed with the optimization thing. It's just that the idea seems like it might have grown out of 3e optimization culture as an example of "You're doing it wrong". The first character I rolled up (as opposed to, "Here, play the cleric!") was a gnome...

Is this some kind of internet joke I've missed or something? I've seen a few references to the combination here and there, and it seems to presented as the absolute joke race/class combo and/or the worst possible thing someone can play. Granted, it's not an optimal choice in 3e, and it really...

It's the same map that's been around for 30 years with older roots, but a different art style. Sure it looks bland and doesn't really capture the flavor of some of the planes, but I can just pull out my Planescape box and drool over that map whenever I want.

That's right. Who wants to play a badger now? Woot! 🦡 That's 'cause 2e was elves' sugar daddy.