Search results

Is one of the few named dragons from that setting, so I guess this makes her important.

Confirmed. Rime is the same Rime from 4e's Draconomicon: Chromatic Dragons. They removed all references to Nerath, however. I have mixed feelings...

Thanks. I love spoilers!

I'm indeed in a phone, lol. But I managed it. Thanks for pointing it out :D

Interesting. Is there a preview of the poem out there? I've watched the video, but the guy doesn't talk about the poem that much.

Can you share the link of that video?

Isn't Rime that white dragon from 4e's Draconomicon? Interesting. If it really is, this means some Nentir Vale love at last!

I'll add Bill Slaviseck. These four were the original creators of the Nentir Vale and I believe that even if they use the current concepts of D&D, their ideas will be faithful to the original "feel" of the Nentir Vale/PoL setting.

This depends. Are dragonborn in the human niche of the "most common race" or in the niche of "the dominant species of this world". I think that dragonborn can be the dominant humanoid species in Reptorth (placeholder name for now), under their masters (and true dominant species of Reptorth), the...

This is my point. We are trying to create here a world meant to be dominated by the scaled ones. Not a world that would become the backstory of Standard Fantasy world #th. I have a few ideas to share here, that I hope I can share when I get home.

That was my point when I said that kobolds should be "the gnomes" of this setting. Kobolds are intelligent and creative creatures. They would the tinkerers and engeeniers of this world, much like the Zil gnomes of Eberron. There couldn't be a setting that has no humanity as the dominant...

In D&D? The only one I can remember from official sources are the troglodytes, but they are always depicted as less advanced than other species/cultures.

Personally, I would have kobolds as the gnomes equivalent, as they are rivals in the traditional D&D lore. I don't know which reptilian species would replace halflings, tho.

It has the same problem of the alignment. I don't want to derail this topic, so just search on this forum "Wall of the Faithless", and you'll see.

Because some people believed it was imposing real world-religious stuff into D&D, and well, religious people aren't the only ones playing D&D.

As if a DM needed some book to tell them what is true or not in their game world. Just saying.

sorry, double post.

Wait? They existed in 5e? As far as I know, they have been pretending that 4e never happened, lol

Actually, they appear in 4e. They were just renamed as Liondrakes. See the Threats to the Nentir Vale book.

Another reason I don't like Planescape, lol. Anyways, we should return to how Fizban and the Old Man with canaries are the one and the same. And in fact, when I used the Old Man in my game, I named him Fizban ;)