Search results

Half-Celestial/Half-Fiend/Aasimar/Tiefling with class levels.

Human Barbarian (Whirling Frenzy Spirit Lion Wolf Totem) 2 / Fighter 8 / Dervish 10. 1. Dodge (human) 1. Mobility 2. Improved Trip (barbarian) 3. Combat Expertise 3. Combat Reflexes (fighter) 4. Martial Study (fighter) 6. Martial Stance 6. Two-Weapon Fighting (fighter) 8. Improved Two-Weapon...

http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/combatStatistics.htm#minimumDamage You apply all penalties and if they bring the damage to 0, you deal 1 point.

Archivist - a divine "Wizard" with a spellprayerbook.

Core is the most broken book in D&D. It has Wizard, Cleric and Druid right next to Monk, Paladin and Fighter. Except a few very good PrCs (mostly caster PrCs) there aren't any that would break the game. You're mostly hurting the weaker classes. Wizards and Clerics have everything they need...

The houserule - very bad idea. Versatile Spellcaster feat from Races of the Dragon is what he needs. It's the exact reason why the feat was made. It would be nice to have it used as intended for once, instead of abused in cheesy ways (that don't even work by RAW).

Players are the biggest problem.

I completely missed the Auras on page 87, lol. The feat says "See page 86". Page 86 primarily lists Aura sources, actual Auras on on page 87. I'm not saying that that they didn't mean those Auras on page 87, but it's totally possible they also meant Auras from other sources. For me it's clear...

Page 86 mentions sources for Draconic Auras, not Auras themeselves. One of them is Dragon Shaman, which has the Vigor Aura.

It's a poor man's fast healing, but it's still great. I mean, always at at least half hit points? Sign me in! Page 86 of Dragon Magic lists sources of auras. Vigor is from Dragon Shaman, PHBII.

No, I don't think that. But I'm sure there will be someone who will attack them, just like you are now attacking my refusal to state them. Where did you get that from? I don't want to defend them, because I'm not interested in defending them. Nah. I'm interested only in what I'm asking, so...

I already said what is relevant. Because it doesn't answer the question, which is "Int, Wis or Cha?" It's not a trick question. It's a simple, straightforward question. "Int, Wis or Cha and why?" My reasons aren't needed for answering the question and I really don't feel like discussing them...

That is irrelevant to this thread. I want imput on the question I asked under the stated parameters. You simply don't want to give an answer I seek. I'm not forcing you, but then I'm wondering why do you see the need to post if you don't have anything relevant to say. I would understand if...

I'm only interested which one of the three is better for the stated purpose. NOTHING ELSE. As a reminder: "None" is not an option. Stats other than Int, Wis or Cha are also not options. What classes or what build is used is also irrelevant, because this houserule is made regardless of that, in a...

That's is not what this thread is about. Clarifications for future: "None" is not an option. Stats other than Int, Wis or Cha are also not options. What classes or what build is used is also irrelevant, because this houserule is made regardless of that, in a vacuum, for future games, not as a...

I don't think you understand. This is a general houserule for all of my future games, not something I'm giving to a specific player or class. So I can't make the decision based on what stat is lowest/highest or what classes my players use because the rule is made regardless of that, in a vacuum.

None is not an option.

I'm asking regardless of class. Mental stat.

As the title says. Which mental stat would be best for bonus APs and why? "None" is not an option. Stats other than Int, Wis or Cha are also not options. What classes or what build is used is also irrelevant, because this houserule is made regardless of that, in a vacuum, for future games. You...

Ranger and Rogue are surprised, unless the fighter used Bluff to deliver a secret message to the Rogue that he's intending to attack and the Ranger didn't notice (failed his Sense Motive).