Search results

Neither do I. Thankfully, 5e will have bounded accuracy which means spells will get obsolete much much slower. Saving throws don't go up with levels, etc. They do. It's called getting access to higher level spells. They do. They can nova with their powerful spells. Please, no action per round...

i,ve read op's idea and i don't see how that system is a simplification. in my games i'm using something much, much simpler and it works well for my group because nobody cares much about encumbrance anyway. the rules are this: certain items are designated as heavy - and you can carry a number of...

That would make the 6th game the D&D Vista, and 7th game...D&D 7. I think we're onto something :eek:

I also don't like the humans. Not from mechanical standpoint, but from roleplaying one. To me, the benefits of the human races are not what I consider humans in D&D. So in my games, I'm going to change them completly. Right now I'm considering this setup: - +2 to two lowest ability scores - Your...

I am so beholder over the pdfs right now.

Where are parts 2, 3, and 4? I want to hear them very much.

Ah yesss, planar travel with sandwiches :cool:

What podcast? Link please.

NO! No more assumed wealth per level dogma.

I like the general idea, but not the implementation. I'd rather see a system that's more ingrained into entire game. Probably with a module. A system in which for every d20 roll you make you also make a d6 or d10 roll that determines the degree of success (if you succeed) or of failure (if you...

Then set up a real money auction house and allow players to buy gold with dollars/euro :p

Not anymore. Three words: World of Warcraft.

Well, weapon attacks arent made against DEX or STR, they are made against AC. This has a serious benefit of not making low DEX/STR characters auto hits and high DEX characters unhittable. Same should be applied to magic. There should be stat (lets call it MR - magic resistance) that works much...

I will probably introduce significant changes to armors and shields. But to do that, I'm going to wait for the next iteration of the playtest and see if wotc done any changes themselves.

I like at will magic, but I don't like that it can be spammed. To prevent spamming spells, I see several possibilities: - a caster may only cast certain amount of at will spells between short rests. Maybe 3, or 2+ability mod, or something like that. - a caster may cast an at-will spell once, and...

Distances should be measured in arensons. 1 arenson equals (more or less) to 1 meter, equals to 1 yard, equals to 3 feet.

I think the sensible way for you would be to houserule those durations into "1 minute outside combat/entire encounter during combat"

Maybe slayer is so angry that whenever he misses, he kicks his target in the nuts.

Nothing you're saying contradicts my idea. Plus, how can anyone be a thief, if thief is a rogue scheme and not a background?

I don't see how schemes are necessary at all. Looking at rogue's scheme, it seems very similar to backgrounds. Why can't rogue simply have a class feature that says: Gain one extra scheme from the following: thief, burglar, conman, etc.