Search results

Given the feedback, I can think of the following refinements: Feat name xxx (probably paragon feat) Prerequisite: martial class, 2 or more daily abilities Benefit: You can lose one martial daily attack power and gain one martial encounter attack power from the same class of your level or lower...

Funny thing, on another forum someone said the exact opposite :)

What do you think about those. Broken, good, useless? Feat name xxx Prerequisite: martial class Benefit: Whenever you level up and gain a new daily power from your main martial class, you can take an encounter power of equal or lower level instead. Feat name yyy Prerequisite: arcane class...

I'm starting to think it would work better as a stance power.

Should begin with your turn, not round. Also, AC is a defense so: Combat Expertise Benefit: At the beginning of your turn, you can choose to take on the weakened condition until the end of your turn. Doing this gives you a +2 bonus to defenses until the beginning of your next turn.

Umm, it's a minor action.

I changed it so it now grants temp HP. That way less text is needed to do essentially the same. The class-specific feats now require either race or 13 in tertiary ability score. Added deadly accuracy as elven heroic feat. Added new tiefling feat - child of the raging sun

DRAGONBORN FEATS DRACONIC VITALITY [Heroic] Prerequisites: Dragonborn, dragon breath Benefit: When you use dragon breath, you gain 3 temporary hit points. At 11th level you gain 6 temporary hit points. At 21st level you gain 9 temporary hit points. DRAKE CLAWSTRIKE [Heroic] Prerequisites...

That would mean SoD are only meant to be used by monsters? Because they would be useless for players (as monsters don't have/use surges).

I like the idea of SoD spells being somehow incorporated into 4e, but I don't like your implementation of it. Imagine a monster with 3 SoDs on it, you have to keep track of every each one and remember which round is it. I would lean toward another possibility for sods: Phantasmal Killer –...

1+Int bonus uses at heroic tier. 2+Int at paragon. 3+Int at epic. It even fits flavorwise. Wizards are best at manipulating magic and can squeeze the most from magic items.

So what. I'm level 25. I spend, say, 1000 gold on those potions for a +20 on all attacks, defenses and skills. I'm a god for 4 hours, near the end of which I cast Cure Disease. (irony is I even get a +20 on Heal check to cure this disease :) )

But does the encounter end for him since he falls unconscious and thus no longer participates in it?

As someone pointed out in another thread, this house rule is a bad idea because of the number of possible re-rolls with high bonuses. Back to workshop.

I have an idea for a houserule but I want your input first. Under this rule magic items that grant bonuses to skill checks would instead allow to re-roll natural rolls equal to their bonus. For example, a Nature +2 item would not grant +2 to Nature, but instead allow to re-roll any Nature check...

They all look okay. How about: 4) Bonuses/penalties to saving throws don't stack (regardless of anything).

Notes from the designer: An idea straight from a MMO, I thought worth giving a shot. General tactics can be a tool for DMs who, for whatever reason, want to ban or tone down magic items in their games because many tactics replicate properties of those items. For that very reason, tactics offer...

Make them rituals then. To each one add prerequisite: specific power, and make casting time in rounds.

If you make it as a daily power than a player has to sacrifice his combat strength in order to take out-of-combat ability. That's a no-no in 4th edition. I think a better idea would be to make feat that grants noncombat use to a few similar combat powers.

Tell me what you think: http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-fan-creations-house-rules/242547-morale.html