Search results

This will be the start page of our campaign wiki.

Seems like a Turing test would solve the P-zombie issue fairly readily: If there is no way to determine whether something is sentient or not, but it acts sentient, then for any practical purpose, it IS sentient.

Well they won't kill Daryl before he's reunited with Earl ..... will they?

It wasn't clear to me that was what had happened either. Though I figured he was looking for Lori, and saw the drag marks on the ground, I didn't make the connection with the bloated Zombie or Rick's decision to cut it open, which I figured was just part of his psychotic break.

Well the show itself was just implying it. But on TD the producer just made it explicit, as it were.

Yes the producer explained on "Talking Dead" that the zombie's belly was distended because it was full of Lori. Ick.

The book could have been a great jumping off point for the kind of huge ensemble cast epic disaster movie that they used to make all the time in the 70s, but seems to have become unfashionable. I would love to see a great director take on an Erwin Allen style approach to the Zombie apocalypse...

When it comes to the governor, there is no shortage of ways for him to be sick. I guess my question is how widely known this is in Woodbury. I mean, in one episode, he had a woman in bed with him and the heads in another room. And where's the daughter been previously?

It is typical of the treatment T-Dog got throughout the series that he doesn't even get his own sendoff, but gets overshadowed by Lori and the baby.

Does anyone remember a short story in Omni from the late 1980s about an alien who comes to earth, kills someone, and takes human form. Then a young woman figures out it's an alien, and (the details are fuzzy), sics it on her ex-boyfriend, has him take his form, and then sleeps with him? I...

Is that a flat screen TV as a table top? Keep your Mountain Dew away from the game surface!

I suspect that's not the case here. This is a pretty Who-savvy group.

I will grant you that I could stand seeing precisely zero more of River song. Her story is pretty well played out.

Well, this is clearly the thread to crap all over Stephen Moffat's contribution to the Dr. Who cannon. Honestly! Ruined? C'mon. We can all have our disagreements on what are and aren't strong episodes or what's happened with the Doctor during the Amy/Rory arc, but it's produced some of the best...

True, but the Doctor read it! Hey, I'm workin' with what I've got here! :)

Here's a thought (while agreeing with Morrus that the Doctor must have read about many things that he subsequently seems to care a great deal about making sure dont' change): Maybe the Doctor can't see Amy and Rory again because the chapter title said it was "Amy's Last Farewell." This would...

Well we may have seen the last of Amy and Rory, but that doesn't mean we've seen the end of their story. There may be wrapping up to be done in future episodes.

Flickering lights were back again. Didn't notice any eggs or references to Christmas. But I might have been out of the room.

That may well be, but if so, then I hope that the next episode gives some kind of payoff for that structure. It should serve some story purpose if that's in fact the way we ought to be viewing them, rather than just being timey-wimey for the sake of timey-wimeiness. Of course, that will assume...

Out of sequence I can buy. Reverse order may not work. But I'm sure that whatever timey-wimey-ness Moffat has in store for next week, I'll wind up being surprised by it, even if everyone else saw it coming a mile away.