Search results

I don't need the dark, violent stuff. I have read all of DD's comic runs; I know he isn't always dark and gritty.

Hmmm. If that's the case, I guess I am just not finding it funny. I like the character, I just wish more happened.

I am just not sure what I am supposed to be getting out of the show; is it laughs? Is there a plot in here somewhere? I dunno. I know I keep tuning in hoping this will be when I see Daredevil...and then being sad.

Personally, I have no doubt that having more ability scores for PCs would make the game better (I was convinced after playing the Divinity: Original Sin series). I also have no doubt that D&DOne will not be switching out from the classic 6 ability scores, because even if it made for a better...

I hope you're not blaming the mod...

Yes. Looks like my group will get to playtest. Very excited about it.

I guess the fact that it's 5e and not 4e is what makes the difference...?

I don't think so. I think Love and Thunder backs up your point quite well.

Ok, so @Tonguez beat me to my first point, but I guess my second point is that all three had writing issues along the lines of "This could all be avoided if one person did one rational thing." Strange not messing with everyone's memory because of a failed college application, for example. A...

Standard MCU approach, no?

Same. I deleted a previous reply because I thought it wasn't what the thread was about.

I did actually suggest the GM could say the good god of healing just heals the person at no cost because they're the good god of healing, and just leave it up to the player's subsequent roleplaying and overall character narrative to make a good story from it.

I'd like to see something really different for sorcerers to make them stand out. Imagine if sorcery points were rolled into spell points, but then gave sorcerers way more options on how to use the points, to really give them that "font of magic" or "raw, untamed power" or "member of the X-Men"...

It's a real problem. I have been in 3 different 5e campaigns with a ranger and the nicest thing I heard about the class from the players is "Eh, it's kinda disappointing. Oh, well."

Well...you could choose not to take offense and simply answer? They're good questions, and and answering would keep things going constructively! :)

I would think that if it can be given, it's not agency.

I tend to agree. It's a very metagame situation to involve "resource balance" answers, and as such, it tends to deflate what could be a good, dramatic narrative. That's why I wondered earlier if we as GMs could trust our players enough to carry the "consequences" of getting that favour...

I like this answer. It makes sense to me. Just for argument's sake though... Is this not an opportunity for the revived player (and the one who prayed!) for an extraordinary character turn, a massive development in the narrative of their story? Like, if we have the idea that this is cheating...

This is a perfectly good way to handle this, and my instinct is I'd probably go with something like it. But the best part of this thread for me is how it's making me question my instincts. So, here's a question for everyone participating: Is it possible, in the game you run, that the god of...

Wait, in your world there are no laypeople of great faith that pray to the god of healing?