Search results

So you missed where I said your "you want medieval was a straw man". Ok lets Focus in the Last Kingdom then. There's a whole range. But LOTR would be a far site better and I didn't think WoT was mumbling. If nothing else, Last Kingdom, Vikings, that is what I like to see.

Which works amazingly well in a movie set in the modern with those colloquialisms.

WHy would they not swear? Because its Aestetically unpleasing WHich Metaphors? I don't remember but I noted them when I heard them. I'd have to rewatch. Medieval Metaphors? Wasn't looking for that. I found the metaphors to meta from what I noted. I thought it was obvious I was talking...

I have had part 5 of the Empire in Ruins campaign on backorder for months. Cubicle 7 informed me the print run was a complete botch (not their fault). Its been a tough run getting the hardcover WFRP Books. Most because of Snafus outlined above.

I'd be OK with that if it wasn't just a swear fest, Also MOdern Metaphors that don't work in context. That is what I don't like, to clarify. So its not the language I object to as much as the coloquial usages.

Once you merge fantasy with Sci Fi the SCI no longer stands for SCIENCE.

I Don't. But I know what sounds modern. This was far to close to a night out on town listening to modern people. The show did animate rules situations well though so I was able to tolerate the modernisms. But it brought the show down for me. I especially dislike the Bard. Other than the...

Fair Enough. I just pray this doesn't happen. I don't like chibi art I can't immerse myself in a story with it.

I am 100% convinced Gygax talk on Tolkein is all legal dodging to avoid the estate. The influences are obvious.

Once a show is relegated to a comedy I no longer am interested. Im not interested in my hobby being made fun of. The D&D Movie has always been a comedy and a drag. I don't mind some humor. I love Guardians of the Galazy humor, but I really really didn't like Thor Ragnarok (Again it felt like...

I doubt they are going to go there. The D&D Cartoon is thoroughly in Grognard Territory. They are no longer the target audience for D&D.

I tend to use Brilliant in a british way more than the "Signifies intelligence" way

This is Paizo doing what they do. WOTC is going in a direction I don't like with adventures, from Coffee shops, to Iron Chef competitions, to just full on narrative adventures. Just like 2008 when WOTC put out a game system I didn't like Paizo was there with what I want. Here they go with a...

This fool doesn't understand collecting. If there was a Captain America comic written as Captain AERICA i'd jump at it... because it was a print run error. Making a Book Derpy because you as a publisher don't catch the error is meaningless, unless he had a bunch more of these to do another...

This guy must just think people are stupid. I can't fathom the logic behind this. He is truly a scam artist and I wish Ernie Gygax would separate from him.

Why do you find it so? It clicked with me very quickly. Actually come to think of it there are alot of ambiguities you just kind of figure out. For example the fact lots of talents add success levels but it's not always clear what talent adds to what skill.

Yes! I did the Oldenhaller contract as an early adventure. You will meet an Oldenhaller later but it doesn't reference the adventure. I think in Middenheim part 3. I weaved the parties past deeds into that section but there's no guidance. So make note of what they do and you can bring it up...

The alignments are guidelines. They never described a personality.

Your table only has to agree. I use the cosmology like Michael Moorcock did. For a cosmology though the nuances don't have to agree across tables. The problem comes from people thinking the PC's have to base their personalities on the alignments.

I'll raise you a Watership Down