Search results

Yeah, those were always curious omissions. Not even the RC has rules for natural healing!

Personally it's not so much about "long-term play" (I had at least two BECMI campaigns go to 36th level); although I can see why a wider variety of content, be it spells, classes, monsters, races, etc. may increase long-term replayability, what I am mainly after is ready-made content I can drop...

I don't have the material at hand for a detailed comparison, but for most of the items (notable exception: mass combat and domain management) you mention, AD&D provides more depth and more gameable material; an example that comes to mind since I used the material recently: in the AD&D DMG, the...

I think a good way to understand the scope of BECMI is to draw parallels with AD&D 1e. We know Frank Mentzer was Gary's "creative right hand", and to this day, he runs pretty much exclusively AD&D 1e with some BECMI "extras". Some similarities are subtle, others more evident: In the Basic set...

No theme, but they are perhaps the best of the crop of BECM. B10, X4, X5, CM1, M1 in particular are golden and showcase the tiers of play. I ran close to that campaign years ago but using AD&D 2e (we liked the added flexibility of races and classes and extra spells), with Dominion and War...

This is the Way!

Early issues of Polyhedron were an official source of errata and clarifications by Gygax himself (through Frank Mentzer.) For example, the spellcasting levels of Rangers and Paladins is nowhere stated in the manuals.

There was extensive errata to all three core books, published in Dragon Magazine. Whole appendices were added to the later printings of the DMG. So if the OP wants to go after originals, it's a good idea to check the printing. The Acaeum website has a list of errata. Note that some of it wasn't...

A thing worth noting is that the game, to the contrary of later editions (including 2e) assumes a rather strict "reward cycle": adventure->get treasure->train to level->adventure. The cycle IS the game, in a sense. Getting treasure is the main objective; killing monsters is highly inefficient...

I'd say the unarmed combat rules (System I) to replace the godawful correspondent in the DMG. The rules on spellbooks are easily integrated.

Definitely. I use them in Birthright, for example, which relies on them. Ditto for Dark Sun. But other settings, or homebrew? Rarely if at all.

QFT! The first encounter I ran for my players with our first 3e game was with a squad of orcs...TPK!

I still run AD&D, but these days, if I feel that skills are needed in the campaign for whatever reason, I prefer to run 3.0. Even in the 2e days, we rarely used NWPs (at least the 2e version was self-consistent and reasonably complete; the 1e versions in DSG and WSG had two different resolution...

The Toughness feat has been mentioned earlier. I house-ruled it and made it class-specific, i.e. to provide the average (rounded up) hit die of the class. So, the standard Toughness applies to Wizards and Sorcerers; to d6 classes it provides 4 hit points; to d8 classes, 5 hit points; to d10...

Thanks everyone for the enlightening discussion, but I think my time here is at an end. For what is worth, the poll seems to suggest that the game isn't that bad, after all, which sort of matches my experience. Enjoy!

I am talking about actual numbers. If there are 100000 players, and 90000 don't have issues, but 10000 have, that's 10% of the population. The fact that 10% of the population is simply more vocal than the 90%, doesn't mean that they have more weight. So yes, I believe you had issues, but "you"...

Do you have statistics to back statements like "majority of people"; "so many people"; "frequent problem"? I am a statistician, and I am always careful when interpreting statements like these, which in many cases really boil down to, to use a non-technical term, "earsay", or just artificially...

[Deleted comment]

Call it "avoidable" then; the crux of the matter is that it doesn't matter to us; so why insist ad nauseam about it?

It doesn't imply that it isn't real, simply that it has not been observed at his table (nor mine, nor the tables of many DM I know). Some things may exist and not be observable (and therefore, not matter at all.) By the same token, I am sure we should not assume that the existence of...